Since 1.2.2 is around the corner, I think I'm gonna skip making 1.2.1
DMG package and go straight for 1.2.2 Mac build.
I was on holidays, so sorry for Mac users missing out on last release.
On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 12:43:23 -0700
Lucas Krech wrote:
> Is there a timeline to get a Mac version of the cu
Is there a timeline to get a Mac version of the current release out?
-L
*insert witty mobile device advertising here*
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
Build for Windows Store.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-d
You missed the most important point. Below the modules list is a
selector "more modules" which allows you to show/hide modules or to add
them to the favorites section.
Regards,
Markus
Am 14.06.2013 21:11, schrieb Henry Johnson:
> Hi,
>
> Apologies in advance if this is a dumb question, I'm using
Hi,
Apologies in advance if this is a dumb question, I'm using Darktable 1.2.1
from:
http://ppa.launchpad.net/pmjdebruijn/darktable-release-plus/ubuntu
I only seem to have about half the modules shown in the online
documentation - for instance in the Correction group I only get Sharpen,
Lens Corr
I've been able to create a profile for my paper with a ColorMunki Photo
on GNU/Debian. The procedure is simple in fact. The printing is not
exactly (some very slight differences) as the one I had with the Epson
generic profile or with the profile created by ArtDigit Print(1) for my
3880 but it loo
| Q : what is the methodology (for idiots please not maths)
| behind the derivation of the differing base curves?
|
| Reason : I use a modified picture style (Canon) very low
| saturation and low contrast to bring the on camera RGB
| histograms closer to the RAW histogram and would like to
| come
Can I suggest there is a bit of 'cart before horse' danger?
If I always took RAWs and my goal was to get my on-camera histograms more of a
match to those RAWs, and I wasn't driven by a desire to match my RAW to the
'normal user's jpeg results' of my camera (which the base curve attempts to
emul
Am Freitag, 14. Juni 2013, 16:02:03 schrieb Francesco Scaglioni:
> Hi,
>
> Q : what is the methodology (for idiots please not maths)
> behind the derivation of the differing base curves?
Manual tweaking by Pascal.
> Reason : I use a modified picture style (Canon) very low
> saturation and low co
Hi,
Q : what is the methodology (for idiots please not maths)
behind the derivation of the differing base curves?
Reason : I use a modified picture style (Canon) very low
saturation and low contrast to bring the on camera RGB
histograms closer to the RAW histogram and would like to
come up with a
