Well, since I also use darktable strictly for image "developing", I guess I'll
mention my favorite image manager at this point, for whatever it's worth:
http://geeqie.sourceforge.net/
It's very stable (for me, over years of use), deeply configurable, flexible
with regard to dividing screen rea
The vertical bars | are not part of the command. Please excuse the odd
formatting.
Am 15.07.2013 01:53, schrieb Benjamin Lipp:
> Hi Micha,
>
> I can only suggest you a way outside of darktable but perhaps it helps:
> at the moment I use exiftool [1] to achieve pretty much the same than
> you. I ha
Hi Micha,
I can only suggest you a way outside of darktable but perhaps it helps:
at the moment I use exiftool [1] to achieve pretty much the same than
you. I have a white list of tags I want to keep. For example I like
keeping the original date and time of the image. I use the following
command t
Hi all,
thanks for your answers and the clarification how copying works with the
denoise (profiled) module. It worked very well for me.
I use darktable for one week now. As passionate Linux user and user of
open source software, I am relieved having found a software replacing
Lightroom for me. No
Hi guys,
metadata and tagging have already been discussed today.
I use tagging for workflow management (bw, final, portrait format or
not) but I'll use color markers in the future. They can be used in
collection filters.
But I also use star rating for priority categories.
I want to export im
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013, Matthias Bodenbinder wrote:
> Am 14.07.2013 17:02, schrieb Aahz Maruch:
>>
>> Unfortunately, it looks like digikam.org changed its hosting late last
>> year to require cookies (i.e. you cannot access digikam.org unless you
>> allow cookies). IMO this is entirely contrary to
That's exactly what it turned out to be, Ulrich, thank you. "Max size" had
been bumped from "0" to "3". Question remains, though: "Why is it so
freaking easy to accidentally change a setting"?
On Jul 13, 2013 11:44 PM, "Ulrich Pegelow"
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> simple topic (even covered in the manual). Y
Am 14.07.2013 17:02, schrieb Aahz Maruch:
> Unfortunately, it looks like digikam.org changed its hosting late last
> year to require cookies (i.e. you cannot access digikam.org unless you
> allow cookies). IMO this is entirely contrary to the principles of Open
> Source and therefore digiKam shou
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013, Halgeir Kj?n?s Rennehvammen wrote:
>
> It's two reason I like Digikam:
> 1) No extra level of abstration (like AcdSee). I images are show
> where they are in the real worlds in files and directories.
> 2) It have a fast database and can do everything related to metadata
> mana
I have seen this thread for quite long time. I'm sure the developers
will improve Darktable related to tagging.
I came from Adobe Lightroom 3 and solved this by using Darktable purly
as a rawdeveloper and had 200-300
tags and needed something fast and easy.
The only open source program which
Hey all,
On 13 July 2013 00:34, Alexander Wagner wrote:
> The single last thing I'd have on my wishlist is a usability
> issue with the current tagging module. Mainly a substring
> search as pointed out in my other mail to add longish chains
> in an easier way. I admit, I'd suggest to start out
Hallöchen!
James writes:
> [...]
>
> P.S.: This is the first time I've accidentally changed something
> in lighttable mode but it's happened frequently in darktable
> mode. It'd be great if a module or a tool in a module didn't
> become active until it was CLICKED. The current hover behavior
> ma
12 matches
Mail list logo
