Re: [Darktable-users] Problem with basecurve tool

2014-04-30 Thread Eildert Groeneveld
On Mi, 2014-04-30 at 18:05 +0200, Matthias Bodenbinder wrote: > Stupid question: (I always tell my students: " there are no stupid questions, only stupid answers" :) ) > > On one side you are using $upperdir/*.DNG > on the other side you are using ../$file.DNG > > Are you sure that $upperdir is r

Re: [Darktable-users] Problem with basecurve tool

2014-04-30 Thread Matthias Bodenbinder
Stupid question: On one side you are using $upperdir/*.DNG on the other side you are using ../$file.DNG Are you sure that $upperdir is really equal to ../ ? Matthias Here is the script I used. It looks pretty much like your script. I just show it here for your convenience. #!/bin/bash TOOLS_

[Darktable-users] Berlin

2014-04-30 Thread DELETREE Philippe
Bonjour If anyone can make a little video on this Berlin meeting, it would be nice. Just to hear feedback from users about this program. Their difficulties and their desire to improvements for future versions. Philippe DELETREE -

Re: [Darktable-users] Darktable user meeting in Berlin May 6th

2014-04-30 Thread Michael Schuster
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Bastien OVCAR wrote: > If someone wants to organise such a meeting in France or Belgium, would be > nice and useful. > > I do not have the skills, unfortunatly. > erm ... what's difficult about that? 1) send email "is anyone interested in a meeting near ? send pri

Re: [Darktable-users] Darktable user meeting in Berlin May 6th

2014-04-30 Thread Bastien OVCAR
Hi, If someone wants to organise such a meeting in France or Belgium, would be nice and useful. I do not have the skills, unfortunatly. Le 30.04.2014 07:37, Michael Below a écrit : > Hello everyone, > > a few Darktable users in Berlin, Germany decided that Darktable needs a > local use

Re: [Darktable-users] Fwd: Re: Decode performance information

2014-04-30 Thread Roumano
Le mardi 29 avril 2014 à 23:56 +0100, Gonçalo Marrafa a écrit : > Thanks Christian. > > > I sort of reached that conclusion. What i don't understand are the CPU > numbers in parentheses. What do they mean? It's something like the Numbers of CPU cycle used to do it. So for "0,443 secs (0,013 CPU)