On Mon, May 18, 2015, at 11:29, Matthieu Moy wrote:
> * TCA correction in "lens correction". This one uses a lens database
> (lensfun) and knows what the TCA of your lens is from this database.
> It applies the reverse transformation to realign the color channels.
> In my experience, this is
Gonçalo Marrafa writes:
> Hi.
>
> DT has two distinct modules for CA correction.
It actually has at least three :
* "chromatic aberration" works only for RAW (only Bayer sensors), and
has no setting: it just guesses the CA and tries to fix it. In my
experience, it works only for very light
Hi.
Has anyone run DT with OpenCL support using Beignet? How is your
experience? Does it work OK? Is the performance noticeable?
Thanks in advance.
Gonçalo Marrafa
--
One dashboard for servers and applications across Ph
There are two kinds of CA. The CA module corrects TCA, the defringe
module supresses color fringes which works both for LCA and TCA.
To fix TCA, the "real" CA module is better because it fixes the
alignment of the RGB color channels instead of just desaturating the
artifacts of disalignment.
Rega
Hi.
DT has two distinct modules for CA correction. What is the difference
between them? What are each one's strong points and weaknesses? I seem to
get better results with the defringe module. It also seems to me to be more
flexible but i would like to know when/why use one or another.
Thanks in
