Hi,
DT 1.6.9. It uses: libgphoto 2.5.8. They have released libgphoto
2.5.9 that fixes a few tethered bugs with the Canon EOS.
Is it safe to update the libgphoto or should I wait for dt2.0 with
libgphoto 2.5.9?
--
sknahT
vyS
-
Hi,
until I came to DT I ..
.. took my fotos as JPG
.. edit it with GIMP
.. administrate it in *Shotwell*
>From this time I have many "tags" related to my fotos in the
Shotwell-Database.
In Shotwell you can quickly add new tags but it is very limited in
searching for this tags (no and/or).
Nested
Hi,
I'd like to know whether others observe this too, before reporting an
issue:
I have the impression that lighttable is reacting much slower in rc2
(and master), than in previous versions (I am not using OpenCL, never
have). When moving around the mouse cursor, the highlighted thumbnail
lags b
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 12:16 PM, KOVÁCS István wrote:
> Merging them in 'difference' mode in the GIMP yields a max. difference
> of 12; the appearance is random noise rather than patterns.
Yeah, that's roughly what's expected between 1.6 and 2.0. For example
here's a regression test between the
Merging them in 'difference' mode in the GIMP yields a max. difference
of 12; the appearance is random noise rather than patterns. The link
to the 500px shot is:
https://drscdn.500px.org/photo/112292745/m=2048/1310f01c03fef084ba9b91fb3f34bb50
On 28 November 2015 at 10:48, Pedro Côrte-Real wrote:
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 9:12 AM, Pedro Côrte-Real wrote:
> In 2.0 we no longer use the input dithering that rawspeed does as we
> apply white and black levels ourselves. We haven't found a situation
> where that is actually a problem. Could you file a bug with a raw+xmp
> so we can have a look?
A
On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 11:45 PM, Francisco Cribari wrote:
> Has anything changed in that regard from DT 1.6.x to DT 2.0 RCx?
In 2.0 we no longer use the input dithering that rawspeed does as we
apply white and black levels ourselves. We haven't found a situation
where that is actually a problem.
