> > with gcc will use OpenCL but I believe that a DT built with clang
> > will not. OpenCL is used by DT for some on-CPU computations, with
> > a fallback to slower code if OpenCL is not available. In my own
> > tests on Fedora 23, this caused a clearly visible slowdown in a
> > clang-compiled DT t
Am Freitag, 15. Januar 2016, 15:39:37 schrieb Chris Siebenmann:
> > I feel the same since the update, but I could't be sure so I thought it
> > might just be my imagination.
> >
> > Hardware:
> > AMD FX-8320 Eight-Core Processor 3,5 Ghz
> > Radeon HD 7970 Ghz Edition
> > 16 GB Ram
> > File, cache
On 09.01.2016 09:21, Roman Lebedev wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 1:49 AM, gersch...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>>> blue colors in the raw files of my Canon 700D are turned into much
>>> darker blue or purple
>>> in darktable when applying the usual corrections (sharpen, orientation,
>
> I feel the same since the update, but I could't be sure so I thought it
> might just be my imagination.
>
> Hardware:
> AMD FX-8320 Eight-Core Processor 3,5 Ghz
> Radeon HD 7970 Ghz Edition
> 16 GB Ram
> File, cache etc. on SSD
>
> I'm also using Arch. Until the release the aur git version, the
I feel the same since the update, but I could't be sure so I thought it
might just be my imagination.
Hardware:
AMD FX-8320 Eight-Core Processor 3,5 Ghz
Radeon HD 7970 Ghz Edition
16 GB Ram
File, cache etc. on SSD
I'm also using Arch. Until the release the aur git version, then the
precompiled pa
Am Freitag, 15. Januar 2016, 06:30:07 schrieb darkta...@911networks.com:
> On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 12:41:25 +0100
>
> Tobias Ellinghaus wrote:
> >What we'd also need to know:
> >
> >- did you compile dt yourself or did you use a package?
> >
>From Archlinux. Should I recompile it myself?
Might be wo
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 1:27 PM, Bernhard wrote:
> when I run "darktable-generate-cache" I get something like this
>
> image 272/14448 (1,88%)
> TIFFReadDirectory: Warning, Unknown field with tag 11 (0xb) encountered.
> TIFFReadDirectory: Warning, Unknown field with tag 11 (0xb) encountered.
> ima
Hi,
when I run "darktable-generate-cache" I get something like this
image 272/14448 (1,88%)
TIFFReadDirectory: Warning, Unknown field with tag 11 (0xb) encountered.
TIFFReadDirectory: Warning, Unknown field with tag 11 (0xb) encountered.
image 273/14448 (1,89%)
TIFFReadDirectory:
On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 07:22:40 +0100
Ulrich Pegelow wrote:
>Hi,
>
>without any profiling data - just with the "feeling" value there
>won't be any help for you.
>
>You need to identify a typical use situation where darktable 2.0
>"feels" slower than 1.6.9. Then you need to reproducably measure the
>
On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 12:41:25 +0100
Tobias Ellinghaus wrote:
>What we'd also need to know:
>
>- did you compile dt yourself or did you use a package?
>From Archlinux. Should I recompile it myself?
>- what's the output of
>ldd `which darktable`|grep gomp
libgomp.so.1 => /usr/lib/lib
Am Donnerstag, 14. Januar 2016, 17:45:21 schrieb darkta...@911networks.com:
> On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 00:34:07 +0100
>
> Tobias Ellinghaus wrote:
> >What CPU and GPU do you have? That doesn't sound right. Please try
> >disabling OpenCL to see if it gets faster. And try running darktable
> >with "-d p
Le 15/01/2016 02:45, darkta...@911networks.com a écrit :
> On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 00:34:07 +0100
> Tobias Ellinghaus wrote:
>
>> What CPU and GPU do you have? That doesn't sound right. Please try
>> disabling OpenCL to see if it gets faster. And try running darktable
>> with "-d perf" to see where t
12 matches
Mail list logo
