The first thing I did was try an identical white balance preset (cloudy) but
this just showed that
the light must have changed between the two shots. Perhaps a cloud went in
front of the sun in the
5 minutes between shots?
The best way to deal with this is to use a spot white balance on a
no
On Wed, 3 Feb 2016 22:22:30 +0100
Dimitrios Psychogios wrote:
> The base curve is applied automatically (see
> https://www.darktable.org/usermanual/ch03s04.html.php), check that
> both have the same preset. Other than that I would recommend you
> share both raw files and their xmp files so we may
I would try spot white balance on a large area on the gravel on both
pictures.
Then equalize the exposure (exposure) and saturation (contrast
brightness saturation) on one of the images. Maybe a little blur
(lowpass) on the far background helps to get similar impression.
Urs
On 02/03/16 19:22,
Maintainer had been informed, see https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/48011 for
status updates.
Am Mittwoch, 3. Februar 2016, 08:11:52 CET schrieb Normand Fortier:
> If you want to go back to the stable 2.0 release, you can downgrade:
>
> # cd /var/cache/pacman/pkg/
> # pacman -U darktable-2.0.0-5-x
The base curve is applied automatically (see
https://www.darktable.org/usermanual/ch03s04.html.php), check that both
have the same preset. Other than that I would recommend you share both raw
files and their xmp files so we may help you further.
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 10:09 PM, wrote:
> On Wed,
Am Mittwoch, 3. Februar 2016, 19:44:30 schrieb Sven Berger:
> Hello everybody,
Hi.
> I hope this is the corret way to get in contact with darktable experts.
It is.
> I wanted to optimize the raw pictures of my nikon 1 j2 camera
> (nef-files) with darktable. I tried out some changes e.g. brightn
we're proud to announce the first bugfix release for the 2.0 series of
darktable, 2.0.1!
the github release is here:
https://github.com/darktable-org/darktable/releases/tag/release-2.0.1
as always, please don't use the autogenerated tarball provided by github, but
only our tar.xz. the checksum
On Wed, 3 Feb 2016 21:15:22 +0100
Dimitrios Psychogios wrote:
>These look like they have different White balances, try setting them
>to the same temperature and compare again.
Just checked, both are identical
tint: 1.009
temp: 5245k
red: 1.984
green: 1
blue: 1.59
preset : camera
> If they stil
These look like they have different White balances, try setting them to the
same temperature and compare again. If they still don't match, maybe you
accidentally applied a different base curve?
On Feb 3, 2016 20:26, wrote:
> DT2.0.
>
> I have some photos and the colors do not match:
>
> http://i.
DT2.0.
I have some photos and the colors do not match:
http://i.imgur.com/xVzkPOY.png
I tried: https://www.darktable.org/2013/04/color-mapping/ I couldn't
get it to work for me. I want to match the gravel.
I've looked in youtube to find some tutorial can't find some demo.
Am I looking at the w
Hello everybody,
I hope this is the corret way to get in contact with darktable experts.
I wanted to optimize the raw pictures of my nikon 1 j2 camera
(nef-files) with darktable. I tried out some changes e.g. brightness,
equalizer and so on. The preview showed me a nice result and so I
exporte
Hi,
>> I saw that there is also a branch (film-emulation) including a clut iop,
>> is there a reason that it didn't get included in darktable?
>
> hehe.. if you tried it you would know. it was terrible to use.
> navigating 3d colour space and inserting mapping vectors to another 3d
> cube isn't
hi,
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 2:23 PM, Maximilian Trescher
wrote:
> Hey,
>
> thanks for the link.
sure.
> I didn't try it yet, but you say it didn't work out that well for the
> luts approximation, which is exactly my intended use case.
yes, unfortunately. precisely because the luts seem to make
Hey,
thanks for the link.
I didn't try it yet, but you say it didn't work out that well for the
luts approximation, which is exactly my intended use case.
I saw that there is also a branch (film-emulation) including a clut iop,
is there a reason that it didn't get included in darktable?
Is the
If you want to go back to the stable 2.0 release, you can downgrade:
# cd /var/cache/pacman/pkg/
# pacman -U darktable-2.0.0-5-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz
See https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/downgrading_packages
It would be good to notify the maintainer, not sure how to do that though.
Le 2016-02-02
Good morning!
I have a couple of hours available to investigate while at work today. Now
I tried to rename my .config/darktable folder and thus start from scratch
with a clean config and empty library.
-Started DT, imported the second image example (church), opened in Darkroom
(DR), back to Lightt
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 5:55 AM, wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 21:10:47 +0300
> Roman Lebedev wrote:
>
>>On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 9:02 PM, wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Is it out? no mention on the darktable/news but it's up on
>>> Archlinux
>>>
>>> https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/dark
17 matches
Mail list logo
