Hi Francisco,
Ulrich's advice seems right on!
In the newer NEF file I'm still not seeing areas of reds with low enough
luminosity to trigger these artifacts. It may just be that the X-Trans
image by a particularly fortuitous chance recorded such saturated dark
reds, but that's a hard to replicate
171814/_F1C6322.NEF.xmp
>
> Best, Francisco
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Dan Torop wrote:
>> __
>> Hi Francisco,
>>
>> Do you have an example NEF file? One with shadows with saturated
>> colors would make this most visible. The Nikon sensor cou
images (e.g., Nikon
> D800 .NEF). Is there anything specific to X-Trans RAW images here?
>
> Thanks again. Best, Francisco
>
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 12:56 AM, Dan Torop wrote:
>> __
>> Hi Francisco,
>>
>> This is interesting...
The trouble seems to come via t
Hi Francisco,
This is interesting... The trouble seems to come via the tone curve
module's automatic scale chroma setting. (The noise doesn't seem to
depend upon the demosaicing algorithm -- it's there with VNG or
Markesteijn.)
When "scale chroma" is set, each pixel processed has its saturation
Hi Mark,
There is indeed a branch with X-Trans support:
https://github.com/dtorop/darktable/tree/xtrans2. If you're comfortable
with Github and compiling your own code, do try it out. You should have
good results, but any feedback is most welcome.
See http://www.darktable.org/redmine/issues/9951
Hi David,
That's great to hear! I do think the non-magenta highlights are thanks
to the camera tonal range and the default Fuji basecurve compressing
highlights. I'm curious if this cameras produces unusually good
highlights?
In general the x-trans branch should be getting somewhere stable, thoug
