If you search the ArgyllCMS mailing list archives for threads in which a
person named Ben Goren participated, you'll find excellent information
on art reproduction.
https://www.freelists.org/archive/argyllcms
Rob gave excellent advice to get you started and what he said will
benefit all of you
I use ArgyllCMS from the command line.
For your basic "calibrate and profile in one step", using ArgyllCMS is
easy. See http://argyllcms.com/doc/Scenarios.html. Scroll down to
Adjusting, calibrating and profiling in one step.
If you want to take complete control over the process, it does get mo
darktable runs fine using the IceWM window manager, running a mix of KDE
and gtk apps and using dispwin to load the monitor profile (no colord,
no Gnome, and the bare minimum of KDE required to run digiKam and Krita
on Gentoo).
Elle
On 10/21/2014 01:50 PM, Bernhard wrote:
> dito, Cinnamon on L
On 10/08/2014 08:04 AM, andrea.angeloni wrote:
> Apart from colorhug, any device known to wrok flawlessy with Linux? I'm
> currently running Debian stable with KDE 4.
http://argyllcms.com/doc/ArgyllDoc.html has a list of color measuring
devices that work with ArgyllCMS.
Debian supplies ArgyllCMS
On 08/07/2014 06:13 AM, Tobias Ellinghaus wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 6. August 2014, 10:26:18 schrieb Elle Stone:
>> So revised question about sRGB as the output profile: Is there a reason
>> why an image processed using "image settings" for the output profile
>> global
On 08/07/2014 06:16 AM, Tobias Ellinghaus wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 6. August 2014, 10:06:38 schrieb Elle Stone:
>> This pdf:
>> http://darktable.org/redmine/attachments/download/764/color_flowchart.pdf
>> seems to indicate that Darktable processing always go through LAB, even
On 08/06/2014 10:06 AM, Elle Stone wrote:
> Is sRGB the only allowed output ICC profile for Darktable? I've chosen
> several different output ICC profiles, Darktable-supplied and also from
> disk. But always the embedded profile is Darktable sRGB. I've tried
> Darktable 1.4.1
his really
the case? Is the image -always- converted to LAB before being converted
to the output ICC profile and saved to disk?
Cheers,
Elle Stone
--
http://ninedegreesbelow.com
Color management and open sou
On 03/10/2014 08:35 AM, Markus Jung wrote:
> I see really saturated colours that look like they're clipping and serious
> loss of highlight detail. However, the image
> looks much better in GIMP (this is without converting the colour profile to
> sRGB):
>
Those saturated highlight colours look
gamma sRGB" or even
"Darktable 4.1 built-in linear gamma sRGB". That way, if the software
embeds some strange version of a standard RGB working space, the user
might have a chance to track down the culprit!
Cheers,
Elle Stone
son who
wrote the patch to make this happen.
If you *apply* in turn the color.org V2 sRGB (black scaled version), the
LCMS2 built-in sRGB, and the ArgyllCMS sRGB.icm profiles to the same
image, one after another, visually you won't see a difference.
If you assign one of these profiles and then
On 12/02/2013 04:57 PM, Simon Spannagel wrote:
> I actually thought darktable would write into the same XMP file using
> its own name space. Therefore the two sets of information shouldn't
> interfere beside the things like rating that are stored in the common
> namespace.
I read through one of t
On 12/02/2013 01:27 PM, David Vincent-Jones wrote:
> Not writing sidecar files would probably negate much of darktables
> capability since there would be no history of processing. Darktable
> would then be another 'dumb' processor in the same manner as Digikam.
> Oil and water simply do not mix wel
On 12/02/2013 12:55 PM, Robert William Hutton wrote:
> On 02/12/13 17:52, Robert William Hutton wrote:
>> On 02/12/13 17:52, Elle Stone wrote:
>>> Is there any way to disable the writing of darktable's XMP files? I
>>> don't want them written to my archive fol
Is there any way to disable the writing of darktable's XMP files? I
don't want them written to my archive folder as I use digikam and
exiftool to take care of tagging, rating, etc.
I really don't want to use darktable's DAM functionality. I don't want
darktable to ever write xmp files and espec
I exported an IT8 target shot using darktable and tried to read it with
argyllcms scanin, which generated errors:
TIFFReadDirectory: Warning, 090710-1301-109-0937.tif: invalid TIFF
directory; tags are not sorted in ascending order.
TIFFReadDirectory: Warning, 090710-1301-109-0937.tif: unknown f
same settings/modules/presets (not sure what the right term is)?
Thanks very much for any enlightenment. I've been struggling with this
for several days and not finding an answer.
Elle Stone
--
November Webinars
17 matches
Mail list logo
