If you want to go back to the stable 2.0 release, you can downgrade:
# cd /var/cache/pacman/pkg/
# pacman -U darktable-2.0.0-5-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz
See https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/downgrading_packages
It would be good to notify the maintainer, not sure how to do that though.
Le 2016-02-02
Le 2016-01-03 11:39, Roman Lebedev a écrit :
> On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Tobias Ellinghaus wrote:
>> Am Samstag, 2. Januar 2016, 13:36:18 schrieb Normand Fortier:
>>> Ok, I must really be affected by the holidays...
>>>
>>> I was clicking on the down-a
Le 2016-01-03 07:20, Tobias Ellinghaus a écrit :
> Am Samstag, 2. Januar 2016, 13:36:18 schrieb Normand Fortier:
>> Ok, I must really be affected by the holidays...
>>
>> I was clicking on the down-arrow next to the lens name / id, and indeed
>> nothing happened. But
:
> Hallöchen!
>
> Normand Fortier writes:
>
>> [...]
>>
>> - the list of camera bodies is however functional;
>> - if I try with a photograph taken with another camera/lens, the lens is
>> recognized (meaning darktable must be able to access the lens database),
>
Hi, I am using darktable 2.0.0 (2.0.0-4 from Archlinux). The lens
correction tool does not recognize the lens I am using but if I click on
the down arrow next to the lens id nothing happens, no lens list is
offered. The issue here is not the fact that my lens is not recognized
but the fact that
Correction: that is fixed in 2.0.0-3 archlinux package. I had 2.0.0-2
and should have upgraded before posting... Apologies.
Le 2015-12-29 12:50, Normand Fortier a écrit :
> I upgraded to Darktable 2.0 recently (Archlinux package), but the
> version reported in the left-top corner of the
I upgraded to Darktable 2.0 recently (Archlinux package), but the
version reported in the left-top corner of the UI (or in the "About"
dialog If I right-click) is
"archive-c3d5e..." (I am not typing the several characters following).
Shouldn't there be an indication of the version number (2.0.0
That's strange, I'm on Arch too but Darktable is in the community repo;
the AUR only contains darktable-git, version 0.9.3...
I just upgraded from 1.6.9 to 2.0.0 through regular pacman -Syu.
Le 2015-12-24 14:35, darkta...@911networks.com a écrit :
> I'm on Arch with DT 1.6.9. I want to update to
Le 2015-12-14 09:29, Tobias Ellinghaus a écrit :
> Am Sonntag, 13. Dezember 2015, 14:19:52 schrieb Normand Fortier:
>> By using xiccd in .xinitrc the profile is indeed loaded, but since I
>> have two monitors darktable-cmstest complains:
>>
>>
>> DVI-I-1
Le 2015-12-14 09:29, Tobias Ellinghaus a écrit :
> Am Sonntag, 13. Dezember 2015, 14:19:52 schrieb Normand Fortier:
>> By using xiccd in .xinitrc the profile is indeed loaded, but since I
>> have two monitors darktable-cmstest complains:
>>
>>
>> DVI-I-1
By using xiccd in .xinitrc the profile is indeed loaded, but since I
have two monitors darktable-cmstest complains:
DVI-I-1the X atom and colord returned different profiles
X atom:_ICC_PROFILE (728480 bytes)
description: PA248 #1 2015-10-17 12-56 2.2 M-S XYZLUT
Thank you, that makes it somewhat clearer. I had tried dispwin in
.xinitrc but that did not load the profile, I will try with the other
software as well.
--
___
Darktable-users
I've recently started to implement color management (Archlinux with
OpenBox) and considering switching from LightZone to a more elaborate
photo software. Darktable seems promising except for color management.
It is very easy to specify a monitor profile for Gimp, LightZone and
Firefox but Darkt
13 matches
Mail list logo
