Hi Marcin,
Good to hear I'm not the only one who has had similar issues! I probably
have to fashion a similar solution as you have. The problem is that I can't
easily separate tifs or jpgs when importing if I have to do it with a file
manager. Do you know if there is way to import only certain fil
Hi Ulrich,
Thanks for your reply.
I would like to challenge your assumption that this is database related.
> It more sounds like darktable is busy generating thumbnails for a huge
> number of images in your collection.
>
> You could test by starting with '-d perf' and see if a lot of pixelpipe
>
Hi Tobias,
Thanks for your reply
> > Looking at tags I noticed that when importing tifs and jpgs, DT adds tags
> > to every image, namely a tag for date, time and copyright info each and
>
> There was a bug with IPTC data being assigned as tags. Do your TIFF files
> have
> IPTC metadata embedde
t; collection rather than trying to load the whole database into the
> lighttable for display?
>
>
>
> Rgds,
>
> Rob.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Mika Mantere [mailto:memant...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* 23 May 2014 05:15
> *To:* darktable-users@lists.sourceforge.ne
OK, thanks for the details. Seems that the delay is in fact not
pixelpipe of thumbnail related.
Ulrich
PS: we should keep the discussion on darktable-users
Am 23.05.2014 20:26, schrieb Mika Mantere:
> Hi Ulrich,
>
> Thanks for your reply.
>
>
> I would like to challenge your assumption that
Hei,
I had similar problem when I have started with Dt.
https://www.mail-archive.com/darktable-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg00678.html
It was related to jpegs scanned by film scanner. I didn't find solution and
I didn't try to import all images into one database. I have archive
database with all
* Ulrich Pegelow [05-23-14 11:52]:
> I would like to challenge your assumption that this is database related.
> It more sounds like darktable is busy generating thumbnails for a huge
> number of images in your collection.
>
> You could test by starting with '-d perf' and see if a lot of pixelpi
Hi,
I would like to challenge your assumption that this is database related.
It more sounds like darktable is busy generating thumbnails for a huge
number of images in your collection.
You could test by starting with '-d perf' and see if a lot of pixelpipe
processing takes place while you are
Am Donnerstag, 22. Mai 2014, 21:15:02 schrieb Mika Mantere:
[...]
> So I decided to try it further and imported around 40K images (mostly nef,
> but psd, tif and jpg too) and then the problems started. All of a sudden it
PSD are not supported.
> now takes many minutes to start DT. Then it goes
Subject: [Darktable-users] db issues
I've been dabbling with DT (among others) in my quest to establish a workflow
on linux (Ubuntu) and I like DT. Darkroom seems very promising for me as I've
been messing around with a few images.
So I decided to try it further and imported around 40K imag
I've been dabbling with DT (among others) in my quest to establish a
workflow on linux (Ubuntu) and I like DT. Darkroom seems very promising for
me as I've been messing around with a few images.
So I decided to try it further and imported around 40K images (mostly nef,
but psd, tif and jpg too) an
11 matches
Mail list logo
