Re: [Darktable-users] Git update

2016-02-19 Thread David Vincent-Jones
Thanks ... will do David On 20/02/16 12:09 AM, Pedro Côrte-Real wrote: > On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 11:04 PM, David Vincent-Jones > wrote: >> I am running a fairly 'basic' Debian where the current dt version is prior >> to 2.0 >> I have some years back pulled from git on a regular basis without pro

Re: [Darktable-users] Git update

2016-02-19 Thread Pedro Côrte-Real
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 11:04 PM, David Vincent-Jones wrote: > I am running a fairly 'basic' Debian where the current dt version is prior > to 2.0 > I have some years back pulled from git on a regular basis without problems. In that case I'd suggest you just grab a release tarball (2.0.1 right no

Re: [Darktable-users] Git update

2016-02-19 Thread David Vincent-Jones
I am running a fairly 'basic' Debian where the current dt version is prior to 2.0 I have some years back pulled from git on a regular basis without problems. I guess I will just run this again from the start and make sure to run from my home dir. David On 19/02/16 11:59 PM, Pedro Côrte-Real wr

Re: [Darktable-users] Git update

2016-02-19 Thread Pedro Côrte-Real
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 10:56 PM, Tobias Ellinghaus wrote: > Well, we had that, but the problem wasn't old .so in the install directory but > that someone removed a module without bumping the api version. If that was > done (I did it later to fix the problems) then the left over woud just be > ign

Re: [Darktable-users] Git update

2016-02-19 Thread Tobias Ellinghaus
Am Freitag, 19. Februar 2016, 22:11:17 schrieb Pedro Côrte-Real: > On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 10:02 PM, Tobias Ellinghaus wrote: > >> rm -fr build > >> rm -fr /opt/darktable/* > > > > Why do people do this? It's making the whole idea of using something like > > "make" pointless. You ONLY have to del

Re: [Darktable-users] Git update

2016-02-19 Thread Lefty Ace
It also looks like you do not have permissions to create files inside /opt/darktable. That will become a problem when you attempt to run make install, so you should follow Pedro's earlier suggestion as well and give your user permissions to write in /opt/darktable: sudo chown -R youruser /opt/dark

Re: [Darktable-users] Git update

2016-02-19 Thread Pedro Côrte-Real
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 10:22 PM, David Vincent-Jones wrote: > So I ran: > -- > cd /opt/darktable /opt/darktable should be your install dir. Your git clone should be somewhere else. Maybe /home/youruser/darktable/ or something like that. That's where you're supposed to be running all the comm

Re: [Darktable-users] Git update

2016-02-19 Thread David Vincent-Jones
So I ran: -- cd /opt/darktable git pull cd build/ make -j install --- and I got the following error message -- Install the project... -- Install configuration: "Release" -- Up-to-date: /opt/darktable/share/locale/cs/LC_MESSAGES/darktable.mo CMake Error at po/cmake_install.cmake:44 (fi

Re: [Darktable-users] Git update

2016-02-19 Thread Pedro Côrte-Real
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 10:02 PM, Tobias Ellinghaus wrote: >> rm -fr build >> rm -fr /opt/darktable/* > > Why do people do this? It's making the whole idea of using something like > "make" pointless. You ONLY have to delete things if a build fails because of > cached CMake results. That's not tru

Re: [Darktable-users] Git update

2016-02-19 Thread Tobias Ellinghaus
Am Freitag, 19. Februar 2016, 09:10:23 schrieb Pedro Côrte-Real: [...] > rm -fr build > rm -fr /opt/darktable/* Why do people do this? It's making the whole idea of using something like "make" pointless. You ONLY have to delete things if a build fails because of cached CMake results. > git pu

Re: [Darktable-users] Git update

2016-02-19 Thread Pedro Côrte-Real
Written from memory but should work: """ CUT HERE #!/bin/sh rm -fr build rm -fr /opt/darktable/* git pull upstream master ./build.sh --prefix /opt/darktable --buildtype Release cd build make install """ CUT HERE For the second line to work you must be the owner of /opt/darktable/ (sudo chown -R

[Darktable-users] Git update

2016-02-19 Thread David Vincent-Jones
I appear to continue having problems updating from the git. Would somebody please give me an appropriate script that I can use. Thanks; David -- Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance APM

Re: [Darktable-users] git update

2016-02-04 Thread Tobias Ellinghaus
Am Donnerstag, 4. Februar 2016, 20:46:32 schrieb David Vincent-Jones: > I have git 2.0 installed (in OPT) and am going to update it ... do any > files need to be removed before the update? No, just update. > David Tobias signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. --

[Darktable-users] git update

2016-02-04 Thread David Vincent-Jones
I have git 2.0 installed (in OPT) and am going to update it ... do any files need to be removed before the update? David -- Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: M

Re: [Darktable-users] GIT update advice

2013-03-04 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Francesco Scaglioni wrote: > Hi, > > Having now it seems migrated to the GIT version of DT. ANy > thoghts on how often to update or on how to ascertain when > to update (as previously I had taken the lazy route and just > waited for Pascal's ppa to squirt something

[Darktable-users] GIT update advice

2013-03-04 Thread Francesco Scaglioni
Hi, Having now it seems migrated to the GIT version of DT. ANy thoghts on how often to update or on how to ascertain when to update (as previously I had taken the lazy route and just waited for Pascal's ppa to squirt something at me ) TIA Francesco