On Sun, 2005-05-08 at 16:58 +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
> If we move away from GNOME CVS, will we lose out on the translations side?
> Right now, it looks like random gnome translators are stumbling onto our
> project and and translating it into all kinds of languages, which I'm very
> impressed by.
Hello,
> If we move away from GNOME CVS, will we lose out on the translations side?
> Right now, it looks like random gnome translators are stumbling onto our
> project and and translating it into all kinds of languages, which I'm very
> impressed by.
An option for translations would be to keep t
Hey,
On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 11:05 -0400, Joe Shaw wrote:
> Yeah, we probably would. I hadn't thought of that. Other
> GNOME-related projects like Rhythmbox and AbiWord get translations and
> they're not developed in GNOME CVS. I'll bring it up on gnome-i18n
> like Enver suggested.
The other pro
On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 19:18 +0300, Enver ALTIN wrote:
> Bring the issue up on the desktop-devel list, and convince
> fellow hackers that some other revision control systems would
> make the development process more effective in the mid term
> and wait until this really h
This is hopefully the last.
Latest inotify breaks ABI and API.
Beagle as of Mon May 9 17:53:35 EDT 2005 supports the new inotify and
is, thus, incompatible.
You want patch version 0.23-6 or later:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml/inotify/v2.6/0.23/
SUSE 9.3 users can grab a k
