-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
While I love the enthusiasm, beagle still is a little to raw for me to
think were at _that_ level of 100% plug and play. Personally, I think
were getting closer, but there is still a lot of work before the dev
team would put such a stamp on it. But t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
D Bera wrote:
> Hi
>
>> beagle in Foresight for well over a year now. The great news is for
>> > quite a while now there haven't been any users asking "What is this
>> > beagled thing and why does it use all my memory?".
>
> Only if you dont do
I do think it is ready for plug and play. In Foresight, we have it
setup to run automatically. The user doesn't have to do anything. We
do also keep it very current, we always get new versions cooked up the
same day beagle releases. It has really worked pretty well for most
people for some time
Hi
> beagle in Foresight for well over a year now. The great news is for
> > quite a while now there haven't been any users asking "What is this
> > beagled thing and why does it use all my memory?".
Only if you dont do the rounds of distro bugzilla and newbie forums.
Those places are full of be
Is there an estimate for the 0.3 release?
--Ken
On Sun, 2006-11-12 at 19:56 -0500, Kevin Kubasik wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
>
>
> Ken VanDine wrote:
> > I think this is a good idea. It has been a while since I made time to
> > write an article for GJ. I woul
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Ken VanDine wrote:
> I think this is a good idea. It has been a while since I made time to
> write an article for GJ. I would be willing to work on this if someone
> can help come up with all the points we want covered.
I'll try to dig up some of
I think this is a good idea. It has been a while since I made time to
write an article for GJ. I would be willing to work on this if someone
can help come up with all the points we want covered.
We could even use this as a means to let distros know beagle is ready to
be included and why they sho
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Ok, I just saw some recent talk about the Gnome Journal and upcoming
publications. I was thinking, we have some big stuff coming up,
primarily, that beagle is getting into the memory usage range where we
can/could seriously consider it as a default f
