Re: beagle-search: Showing the top 2 of 3 total matches

2007-04-01 Thread D Bera
> > Which version of beagle are you using ? > > 0.2.16, which I downloaded and installed on Mar-13. > > Hm, maybe I should upgrade to 0.2.16.3. Ah. Then there is some other issue. The bug I was referring to was fixed before 0.2.16. You can do one thing, the next time you see beagle-search not disp

Re: beagle implementation in C

2007-04-01 Thread Peter Bruhn Andersen
Glad to hear it...and a bit embarrassed. :-[ Nice one, Debajyoti :-D Lukas Lipka wrote: Dudes, April Fools joke! :-D On 4/1/07, *Peter Bruhn Andersen* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: Well, to me that is just as bad as it gets. I left C a long time ago and

Re: beagle implementation in C

2007-04-01 Thread Debajyoti Bera
> Dudes, April Fools joke! :-D Thanks Lukas :) Don't say I didn't give a hint. > > ... svn.gnome.org/svn/beagle/trunk/cbeagle by 06/31/07... > > > Recently there has been an increase of beagle memory related and > > crash bugs. > > > It is increasingly getting difficult to fix such bugs so

Re: beagle implementation in C

2007-04-01 Thread Lukas Lipka
Dudes, April Fools joke! :-D On 4/1/07, Peter Bruhn Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Well, to me that is just as bad as it gets. I left C a long time ago and don't want to go back that road again. Your decision will certainly keep me away from Beagle now. It might be that I'm a minority in h

Re: beagle implementation in C

2007-04-01 Thread Peter Bruhn Andersen
Well, to me that is just as bad as it gets. I left C a long time ago and don't want to go back that road again. Your decision will certainly keep me away from Beagle now. It might be that I'm a minority in hoping that you would stick with Mono but nevertheless I'll ask you to reconsider. Regard

Re: beagle implementation in C

2007-04-01 Thread MrJ Man
On Sunday 01 April 2007 19:21, Debajyoti Bera wrote: > Hey all, > Recently there has been an increase of beagle memory related and crash > bugs. It is increasingly getting difficult to fix such bugs so I (we?) have > decided to re-implement beagle in C. That will allow us to do precise > memo

Re: beagle causing high load when X not active?

2007-04-01 Thread Felix E. Klee
At Sun, 1 Apr 2007 11:09:16 -0400, Joe Shaw wrote: > If $DISPLAY is unset, you would have to run beagle-shutdown to shut > down the daemon (or --replace, which effectively does a shutdown and a > restart). Hm, I did have "beagled --replace" in my ~/.bash_profile, and nevertheless several beagle de

Re: beagle implementation in C

2007-04-01 Thread Carl van Tonder
I'm immensely excited by this news - even after some serious work on the beagle team's part, the current version in Feisty is still quite a lot larger in terms of resources that anyone would like for a daemon. I do think it's a shame that one of C#'s flagship products is switching, but it seems a l

beagle implementation in C

2007-04-01 Thread Debajyoti Bera
Hey all, Recently there has been an increase of beagle memory related and crash bugs. It is increasingly getting difficult to fix such bugs so I (we?) have decided to re-implement beagle in C. That will allow us to do precise memory allocation and de-allocation leading to better memory

Re: beagle causing high load when X not active?

2007-04-01 Thread Joe Shaw
Hi, On 3/30/07, Felix E. Klee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > beagled somehow detects when I switched to a different virtual console > and think the machine is now idling. Yeah, I can only assume that switching to a VT causes the X screensaver extension to kick in. > > Another possible workaround i