Hi,
Wow! This is awesome. I am very happy Beagle is still solving problems
for people -- your beagrep looks very interesting -- and thank you for
updating the code to use MimeKit over GMime. It is definitely a big
improvement.
Keep up the great work!
Joe
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 9:29 PM
Thank you Mr. Joe Shaw, and your friends, for writing beagle in the first
place!
Because in a sense I am building my entire career around beagle and
beagrep. Whatever code I read and write, I use beagrep:-D
2014年12月31日 下午10:43于 Joe Shaw j...@joeshaw.org写道：
Hi,
Wow! This is awesome. I am
On Wed, 2014-12-31 at 10:29 +0800, Haojun Bao wrote:
I am using it to index my maildir mails. The gmime-sharp 2.6 is so
broken, it is completely unusable, so I have changed to use MimeKit.
Awesome, I loved Beagle, and the bit of Dashboard that managed to
evolve.
Please take a look at my fork
Brian J. Murrell br...@interlinx.bc.ca wrote:
Recoll is a really better alternative remplacement of beagle.
I don't want to start a holy war, but no it's not. It doesn't index
instantly for one thing and it hammers the disk with periodic (i.e. from
cron) scans of entire filesystems just
On 10 February 2011 23:16, Gabriel Burt gabriel.b...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think anybody is actively working on beagle, but I wouldn't
call it dead. It's still used by many people, and we're at least
keeping it runnable -- eg we had an update to adapt to new Mono.Sqlite
APIs upstream
On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 10:35 +1100, Roger Lainson wrote:
I've been using Beagle for a couple of years in a rather different
way, which I guess is essentially GNOME-free. That is, I've been using
beagled running on our small company server, with a couple of
home-grown PHP pages to invoke beagle
Hi Adam,
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 6:36 AM, Adam Tauno Williams
awill...@whitemice.org wrote:
A major reason why I gave up on Beagle and
the whole Linux desktop itself was due to this attitude. I guess the
developers of those apps are more thick skinned or resilient than I
was? I don't know
I don't mean to sound nostalgic, but back then Beagle was one of the
best and fun projects to hack on!
L.
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Joe Shaw j...@joeshaw.org wrote:
Hi Adam,
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 6:36 AM, Adam Tauno Williams
awill...@whitemice.org wrote:
A major reason why I gave
m aka dikatlon
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Lukas Lipka lukasli...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't mean to sound nostalgic, but back then Beagle was one of the
best and fun projects to hack on!
L.
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Joe Shaw j...@joeshaw.org wrote:
Hi Adam,
On Mon, Feb 14
, Lukas Lipka lukasli...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't mean to sound nostalgic, but back then Beagle was one of the
best and fun projects to hack on!
L.
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Joe Shaw j...@joeshaw.org wrote:
Hi Adam,
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 6:36 AM, Adam Tauno Williams
awill
at 3:25 PM, Lukas Lipka lukasli...@gmail.com
wrote:
I don't mean to sound nostalgic, but back then Beagle was one of the
best and fun projects to hack on!
L.
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Joe Shaw j...@joeshaw.org wrote:
Hi Adam,
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 6:36 AM, Adam
about the code, go ahead and push it AFAIAC.
Thanks,
Joe
peace!
-joel m aka dikatlon
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Lukas Lipka lukasli...@gmail.com
wrote:
I don't mean to sound nostalgic, but back then Beagle was one of the
best and fun projects to hack on!
L.
On Mon
Recoll is good, but is different from Tracker and Beagle and it does't
fit with GNOME desktop very good.
On the other hand, tracker 0.8 and 0.9 are pretty usable. I use it on
a PC and works well, also if Beagle was far better.
It is very sad that mono folks are so committed with applications
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 4:44 PM, guido iodice guido.iod...@gmail.com wrote:
It is very sad that mono folks are so committed with applications like
f-spot or banshee, that have many good alternatives, or on mono-mac,
mono-iOS, mono-android mono-whatyouwant, while Beagle died.
I can't
I've been using Beagle for a couple of years in a rather different way,
which I guess is essentially GNOME-free. That is, I've been using
beagled running on our small company server, with a couple of home-grown
PHP pages to invoke beagle-query and parse its output. Works very well
indeed
Le vendredi 11 février 2011 à 13:28 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams a écrit :
I feel the same way; I'd hoped Tracker could serve as a replacement
for
Beagle but to call it a disappointment is an understatement.
Recoll is a really better alternative remplacement of beagle. You can
index only
On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 18:02 +0100, Jérôme wrote:
Recoll is a really better alternative remplacement of beagle.
I don't want to start a holy war, but no it's not. It doesn't index
instantly for one thing and it hammers the disk with periodic (i.e. from
cron) scans of entire filesystems just
Brian,
This strikes me as a "Betamax" defense. The world is full of
technologically superior products that failed for lack of some critical
non-technical component. Beagle hasn't had any significant support in
over a year, and is becoming increasingly incompatible with other
ap
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 13:53 +0100, Johannes Rohr wrote:
Dear beagle hackers,
since the mailing list is inactive I fear that beagle is now ultimately
abandoned. Is this the case? If so, this really makes me sad.
I have been using beagle daily for a number of years and I still find
On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 13:28 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
I feel the same way; I'd hoped Tracker could serve as a replacement for
Beagle but to call it a disappointment is an understatement.
Ditto. I have continued to be disappointed by Tracker. I've completely
removed it from my
Dear beagle hackers,
since the mailing list is inactive I fear that beagle is now ultimately
abandoned. Is this the case? If so, this really makes me sad.
I have been using beagle daily for a number of years and I still find
that there is no better desktop search available on Linux
I don't think anybody is actively working on beagle, but I wouldn't
call it dead. It's still used by many people, and we're at least
keeping it runnable -- eg we had an update to adapt to new Mono.Sqlite
APIs upstream. Feel free to work on it!
Gabriel
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 6:53 AM, Johannes
Hi,
Nice work!
If you're comfortable hacking around in the Beagle codebase, you could
probably make the tokenizer (called an analyzer in Lucene parlance)
act more appropriately for code so that things like underscores aren't
stripped out. Take a look at beagled/LuceneCommon.cs
Hi All,
I have captured the XML message when using the Beagle Web. From this XML, I
tried to write an XML Schema. The XSD file is attached, what do you think about
this schema ? Is it well written ?
Then, I used Jaxb to generate the Java Binding Classes (ResponseWrapper.java
Hello,
i am working for SoftMaker in Germany. We want to add an external filter
for Beagle which should enable Beagle to search our own office formats
like *.tmd and *.pmd for TextMaker and PlanMaker.
I did edit the following external-filters.xml file in etc/beagle:
?xml version=1.0
Hi,
Is there any documentation about the Beagle XML/Unix API, please ? I think it's
used by the web user interface.
Thanks,
Stéphane
*
This message and any attachments (the message) are confidential and intended
solely for the addressees.
Any unauthorised
Hello,
On 22 February 2010 19:27, sjeanjean@orange-ftgroup.com wrote:
Hi,
Is there any documentation about the Beagle XML/Unix API, please ? I think
it's used by the web user interface.
This should be a good starting point for you:
http://beagle-project.org/Writing_clients
--
Arun
I would like to wrote a client using Java, so that's why I think about the
XML API.
Say me if I'm wrong, but on this page I can see only C, C# or Pyhton, not
XML ?
If you look at the XSL based parsers in beagle/webinterface/.../*.xsl
files, you will get an idea of the structure of the xml
On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 10:59 -0500, Joe Shaw wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 6:19 AM, Adam Tauno Williams
awill...@whitemice.org wrote:
BTW, I love Beagle - it is a massive improvement over 'managing files'.
But, at least for me, it has stopped working. Since I last updated Mono
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 08:49 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 10:59 -0500, Joe Shaw wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 6:19 AM, Adam Tauno Williams
awill...@whitemice.org wrote:
BTW, I love Beagle - it is a massive improvement over 'managing files'.
But, at least
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 4:39 PM, vatsal nidhi vatsal7...@gmail.com wrote:
I am working on a project which requires the integration of the Nautilus
File Manager with Beagle ,that is , i want to provide the functionality of
Beagle in the file manager .
This has already been implemented
Williams
awill...@whitemice.org wrote:
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 08:49 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 10:59 -0500, Joe Shaw wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 6:19 AM, Adam Tauno Williams
awill...@whitemice.org wrote:
BTW, I love Beagle - it is a massive improvement over
Shaw wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 6:19 AM, Adam Tauno Williams
awill...@whitemice.org wrote:
BTW, I love Beagle - it is a massive improvement over 'managing files'.
But, at least for me, it has stopped working. Since I last updated Mono
it just churns out a lot
...@whitemice.org wrote:
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 08:49 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 10:59 -0500, Joe Shaw wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 6:19 AM, Adam Tauno Williams
awill...@whitemice.org wrote:
BTW, I love Beagle - it is a massive improvement over 'managing files
Hi,
I am working on a project which requires the integration of the Nautilus
File Manager with Beagle ,that is , i want to provide the functionality of
Beagle in the file manager .The indexing part of Beagle would remain the
same but the interface has to be through the file manager.I have gone
2010/1/25 vatsal nidhi vatsal7...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I am working on a project which requires the integration of the Nautilus
File Manager with Beagle ,that is , i want to provide the functionality of
Beagle in the file manager .The indexing part of Beagle would remain the
same but the interface
actively
supported, even though probably a bit less mature than beagle?
It seems to me that the future is Tracker [which is sad, the world
doesn't need any more unmanaged code. Ick!] Most significantly Tracker
will almost certainly be integrated with the GNOME Activity Journal
http://live.gnome.org
like its actively supported, even
though probably a bit less mature than beagle?
I would say it depends on what you want to do, and how much time and
effort you are willing to invest in development, if any. At this
point, Tracker has a lot more development going on it.
Joe
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 6:19 AM, Adam Tauno Williams
awill...@whitemice.org wrote:
BTW, I love Beagle - it is a massive improvement over 'managing files'.
But, at least for me, it has stopped working. Since I last updated Mono
it just churns out a lot of -
---
20100122 06:15:13.6246
autosuggest.
I took a look a the code, and it seems very readable, so I'm a bit more
comfortable with beagle.
Regarding Novell, is there a commercial license for Beagle present? Is it
required or it something one can buy for support :)
thanks
Amish
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 7:59 AM, Joe Shaw j
, is there a commercial license for Beagle present? Is it
required or it something one can buy for support :)
Hopefully someone from Novell on the list can chime in on this. :)
Joe
___
Dashboard-hackers mailing list
Dashboard-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Joe Shaw j...@joeshaw.org wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Amish Shah am...@kakai.com wrote:
Regarding Novell, is there a commercial license for Beagle present? Is it
required or it something one can buy for support :)
Hopefully someone from Novell
Hi,
How active is this project? I'm doing a comparison between beagle and
tracker trying to decide which meta search engine to use. Beagle seems
great, but kind of inactive especially lately.
thanks
Amish
___
Dashboard-hackers mailing list
Dashboard
Hi,
Beagle isn't in active development. It is getting some occasional
maintenance done by Novell.
Joe
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Amish Shah am...@kakai.com wrote:
Hi,
How active is this project? I'm doing a comparison between beagle and
tracker trying to decide which meta search
beagle?
thanks
Amish
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Joe Shaw j...@joeshaw.org wrote:
Hi,
Beagle isn't in active development. It is getting some occasional
maintenance done by Novell.
Joe
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Amish Shah am...@kakai.com wrote:
Hi,
How active
does beagle cleans up its indexes and textcaches now and then?
I mean it looks like old documents (now removed) still come up when
searching...
is there a way to clean indexes and textcache, or should I simply remove
these directories in the .beagle folder now and then?
It should, but I
D Bera wrote:
does beagle cleans up its indexes and textcaches now and then?
I mean it looks like old documents (now removed) still come up when
searching...
is there a way to clean indexes and textcache, or should I simply remove
these directories in the .beagle folder now and then?
It should
does beagle cleans up its indexes and textcaches now and then?
I mean it looks like old documents (now removed) still come up when
searching...
is there a way to clean indexes and textcache, or should I simply remove
these directories in the .beagle folder now and then?
...
I was worried
does beagle cleans up its indexes and textcaches now and then?
I mean it looks like old documents (now removed) still come up when
searching...
is there a way to clean indexes and textcache, or should I simply remove
these directories in the .beagle folder now and then?
It should, but I
Hi
does beagle cleans up its indexes and textcaches now and then?
I mean it looks like old documents (now removed) still come up when
searching...
is there a way to clean indexes and textcache, or should I simply remove
these directories in the .beagle folder now and then?
thanks
Hi all,
I was just catching up on the thread from a month ago about Beagle's
maintenance status[1]. There were several comments inquiring about
Novell's involvement in the project. Part of my responsibilities at
Novell include doing bug fixing and limited feature development work
on Beagle. I
fixing and limited feature development work
on Beagle. I know it's nothing compared to two employees working on
it full-time, or having DBera maintaining the project. But I just
wanted you to know that Novell is still putting some resources behind
supporting Beagle.
Good to hear
people to the project or maybe not.
Please download and try the new webinterface at the following link. Any
feedback/comment is incredible valuable.
http://globalsyons.com/projects/beagle/beagleWI.tar.gz
Kind Regards
--
Hugo Sarti
Ingeniero en Sistemas de Información
Syons
www.syons.com.ar
. Any
feedback/comment is incredible valuable.
http://globalsyons.com/projects/beagle/beagleWI.tar.gz
Kind Regards
--
Hugo Sarti
Ingeniero en Sistemas de Información
Syons
www.syons.com.ar
___
Dashboard-hackers mailing list
Dashboard-hackers
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Arun Raghavanaru...@src.gnome.org wrote:
commit 95b10dd1dc58068fa09d38fa6bac3763afc9c8f9
Author: Arun Raghavan ford_pref...@gentoo.org
Date: Sun Jul 26 23:10:44 2009 +0530
Remove duplicate 'beagle-part-property.h' from include_HEADERS
Hello folks,
I see that there has been some discussion in the past regarding the
maximum number of hits returned by beagle-query. I'd like to throw in
my 2c worth with the following comments:
The hard-coded limit of 100 hits is the single most annoying thing in
the whole of beagle, which
Thanks for your advice, but regrettably it just doesn't work: Total hits: 0.
So is this a bug? (I haven't actually found any documentation on what should
work).
Can someone tell me how to use beagle-query with the search-term being a
uri: with spaces (or other funny characters
Thanks for your advice, but regrettably it just doesn't work: Total hits: 0.
So is this a bug? (I haven't actually found any documentation on what should
work).
Can someone tell me how to use beagle-query with the search-term being a
uri: with spaces (or other funny characters
Thanks for your advice, but regrettably it just doesn't work: Total
hits: 0. So is this a bug? (I haven't actually found any documentation
on what should work).
Cheers, Roger
D Bera wrote:
Can someone tell me how to use beagle-query with the search-term being a
uri: with spaces (or other
Can someone tell me how to use beagle-query with the search-term being a
uri: with spaces (or other funny characters) in it? For example,
beagle-query actually returns a hit like
file:///var/SDRFiles/COMMON/Suppliers/MCS/Price List.xls - and I want pass
this back again to beagle-query
Hi again,
I think I have found the reason because I don't receive anything when I look
for some document from another computer. I have tried to do it in the computer
hosting beagle server in two ways, first from http://localhost:4000 and then
from http://10.5.36.50:4000 (its network IP
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 8:25 AM, j r muxu...@hotmail.com wrote:
I obtained a different answer depending on the URL call, and if I invoke the
server from 10.5.36.50:4000 I receive an invalid XML string. For example:
FROM HTTP://10.5.36.50:4000 (Invalid xml string)
391 // This number seems
. The strange
byte is 0xff which beagled sends at the end of each message - it is
used in the client javascript code to split byte streams into
meaningful segments.
- dBera
--
-
Debajyoti Bera @ http://dtecht.blogspot.com
beagle / KDE fan
Hi,
Can someone tell me how to use beagle-query with the search-term being a
uri: with spaces (or other funny characters) in it? For example,
beagle-query actually returns a hit like
file:///var/SDRFiles/COMMON/Suppliers/MCS/Price List.xls - and I want
pass this back again to beagle-query
Hi all,
First of all, thanks for your great work with this application and all your
efforts.
I'm trying to make accesible Beagle for everybody in a private network. For my
purpose I'm using the Web Interface as I have some computers working with
Windows. So my idea is to index a network
Wondering if there's a way to make sure,
that Beagle, is running correctly according to htop,
there are allot of beagle pid running like 9 sometimes up-to 13
So, is there a command code to check and see if all is well,
with beagle?, and that this is a normal running beagle.
Thanks!
Richard
Hi,
Wondering if there's a way to make sure,
that Beagle, is running correctly according to htop,
there are allot of beagle pid running like 9 sometimes up-to 13
I am very confident that htop is displaying threads as well. Ask it to
only display the processes and there should be 2 - one
Dear All,
I have tried to install the beagle plugin for thunderbird 0.1.3 on
thunderbird 2.0.0.21 - the OS environment is Ubuntu Jaunty.
Unfortunately, no email is indexed, I only get the error:
An error occured while indexing. Error description: TypoError:
account.incomingServer has
Hey,
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 12:21 AM, Arun Raghavan aru...@svn.gnome.org wrote:
The git repo should be up again. Please give it a spin and let me
know. I'll try to build everything once in a while, and diff the 2
trees to make doubly sure.
I am updating my Ubuntu to Jaunty so I can't test it
'ello!
The build seems fine, and the two trees also seem to be identical.
--
Arun Raghavan
(http://nemesis.accosted.net)
v2sw5Chw4+5ln4pr6$OFck2ma4+9u8w3+1!m?l7+9GSCKi056
e6+9i4b8/9HTAen4+5g4/8APa2Xs8r1/2p5-8 hackerkey.com
___
Dashboard-hackers mailing
'ola! :)
The git repo should be up again. Please give it a spin and let me
know. I'll try to build everything once in a while, and diff the 2
trees to make doubly sure.
Cheers,
Arun
___
Dashboard-hackers mailing list
Dashboard-hackers@gnome.org
Hello All,
I'd spoken about this on #git, but just to keep some history on this:
I tried building Beagle from git and it complained about a missing
file. I diff'ed the svn and git trees and found that
beagle/beagled/Lucene.Net differed significantly (there are files that
are missing and extra
Hi,
Can I run the Beagle components in windows environment
Where can I get the following components
1. Beagle.Daemon
2. Beagle.Util
Do I need Mono environment to run these components.
Thanks
Regards
Ravi
Thanks
Regards
Ravi
Thanks for the reply.
I have downloaded the latest source code (beagle-0.3.9) from the web site.
Can I built the assembly(beagle.dll etc..) by opening the C# files in a new
project via VS.NET in windows.
Thanks
Regards
Ravi
--- On Tue, 3/31/09, Joe Shaw j...@joeshaw.org wrote
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:19 AM, veeraraghavan ravi vravi...@yahoo.com wrote:
I have downloaded the latest source code (beagle-0.3.9) from the web site.
Can I built the assembly(beagle.dll etc..) by opening the C# files in a new
project via VS.NET in windows.
I've never tried -- I'm
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:48 AM, veeraraghavan ravi vravi...@yahoo.com wrote:
I tried to build the beagle assembly in windows via VS.NET. But failed.
There are several Beagle assemblies. Util.dll is one,
BeagleClient.dll is another, BeagleDaemon.exe, etc. As I've said,
there is a lot
Hi all,
I have been searching for an http proxy that indexes all that it serves.
Could you please tell me if Beagle have such a feature ?
Thanks in advance
into this problem yet.
If no one is interested in helping on this, evolution support in
beagle will soon be a thing of the past.
- dBera
--
-
Debajyoti Bera @ http://dtecht.blogspot.com
beagle / KDE fan
Mandriva / Inspiron-1100 user
Hi Jens,
after upgrading beagle from 0.3.5 to 0.3.8 (both Ubuntu packages), I
...
same file with the error process too big. When I use --disable-restart, it
fails with too many files open, which I can probably fix, but I was
wondering what might have changed from 0.3.5 to 0.3.8 to cause
at any
time and they should disappear after 5/10 seconds at the most.
After running beagle-build-index on the heavy data set for a while,
the number of open files kept growing; I killed the process at 257 open
files, copied all those files to another directory, and re-ran
beagle-build-index
Hello,
I 'm just installed the beagle-0.3.9 and found it is a useful tool.
I have a question for you guys.
The items (I mean the space between items) in the result pages (GUI) are too
big. I see this under folders of the Images and documents except the
conversations. Do you know why? Could
Hello,
I just installed the beagle-0.3.9 and found it is a useful tool.
I have a question for you guys.
The
items (I mean the space between items) in the result pages (GUI) are
too big. I see this under folders of the Images and documents except
the conversations. Do you know why? Could you
I 'm just installed the beagle-0.3.9 and found it is a useful tool.
I have a question for you guys.
The items (I mean the space between items) in the result pages (GUI) are too
big. I see this under folders of the Images and documents except the
conversations. Do you know why? Could you
Hi,
Beagle and libbeagle 0.3.9 is now available. Besides lots of bug
fixes, this release fixes a major problem with mono-2 where temporary
files would not be deleted.
THE SHORT OF IT
---
Beagle is a Linux desktop-independent service which transparently and
unobtrusively indexes
Hey folks,
Beagle project is looking for a maintainer.
I am currently the only active developer/maintainer but for the last
several months I am finding it hard to devote time for this project. I
will probably relocate by the end of the summer and then I will be
completely cut-off from
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 6:13 PM, D Bera dbera@gmail.com wrote:
Beagle project is looking for a maintainer.
Yeah, I just want to reiterate that it'd be great if someone could
step up. I also don't have the time to dedicate to Beagle what I
would like, but I can definitely help mentor
Udo van den Heuvel wrote:
D Bera wrote:
I am running beagle-thunderbird 0.3.8-13 on my FC10 system.
I experienced loads (10's of thousands) of tmp files in /tmp containing
headers of old email messages after installing beagle-thunderbird.
Are these files coming from beagle-thunderbird
x86_64 on AMD Phenom SMP system.
It appears that the mails in thunderbird are indexed over and over.
(more items added than total count of mails in thunderbird)
Won't this pollute my Beagle index?
I get 1000s of small files per day so clean them out manually every now and
then.
What can I
D Bera wrote:
I get 1000s of small files per day so clean them out manually every now and
then.
What can I do at this stage to dig up the cause?
Something major seems to wrong. I would suggest stopping indexing, at
least thunderbird, for the time being. I am investigating the cause.
Hello,
I am running beagle-thunderbird 0.3.8-13 on my FC10 system.
I experienced loads (10's of thousands) of tmp files in /tmp containing
headers of old email messages after installing beagle-thunderbird.
Are these files coming from beagle-thunderbird?
If so:
Why are there so many?
Why
I am running beagle-thunderbird 0.3.8-13 on my FC10 system.
I experienced loads (10's of thousands) of tmp files in /tmp containing
headers of old email messages after installing beagle-thunderbird.
Are these files coming from beagle-thunderbird?
If so:
Why are there so many?
Why aren't
. I'll keep digging.
It would be cool if there was a Mono solution project or projects for
the various pieces maybe, but I'm new to Mono (not C#) and Beagle so
maybe that's not a great idea.
Cheers
On Fri, 2008-11-07 at 10:35 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 3:57 AM, Darren
Hi,
I pulled the beagle source code down and want to compile it. The
INSTALL refers to ./configure script which isn't there. Nor are there
csproj files I could use with Mono. What is the best way to rebuild
beagled or the other projects?
thanks,
Darren
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 4:30 PM, Darren Govoni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I pulled the beagle source code down and want to compile it. The
INSTALL refers to ./configure script which isn't there. Nor are there
csproj files I could use with Mono. What is the best way to rebuild
beagled
: can't shift that many
$
On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 17:13 -0400, Joe Shaw wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 4:30 PM, Darren Govoni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I pulled the beagle source code down and want to compile it. The
INSTALL refers to ./configure script which isn't there. Nor
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 3:57 AM, Darren Govoni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried that. I'm using Ubuntu. It doesn't generate any makefiles. here
is the tail...
[snipped]
vc_variable='PKG_CONFIG'
want_gettext='false'
want_glib_gettext='true'
want_gnome_doc_utils='false'
want_gtk_doc='false'
1) Is there any reason why I couldn't have another process read
the beagle document indexes and add lucene fields to the existing lucene
document entries? I know lucene only likes 1 index writer. I'd be
writing to it from a separate Java lucene app.
There is nothing stopping you from doing
Hi,
Just discovered Beagle and think its great! Couple of quicky developer
questions.
1) Is there any reason why I couldn't have another process read
the beagle document indexes and add lucene fields to the existing lucene
document entries? I know lucene only likes 1 index writer. I'd
to update the beagle patch this weekend.
--
Alexey Shabalin
___
Dashboard-hackers mailing list
Dashboard-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dashboard-hackers
this is an updated patch which compiles, untested beyond that.
Jeff
On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 16:26 +0400, Alexey Shabalin wrote:
2008/10/7 Jeffrey Stedfast :
Yea, I made some changes to the GMime API after writing the initial
patch. I'll try to update the beagle patch this weekend.
Jeff
1 - 100 of 1400 matches
Mail list logo
