Beagle on encrypted partitions yeilds horrible system performance

2008-03-26 Thread David Nielsen
I am hitting kind of a nasty performance problem, my current test setup is a two disk mdraid RAID0 setup with lvm ontop of a dmcrypt, all partitions beagle touches are ext4. Now every time beagle 0.3.4 indexes a folder, the entire system becomes near non responsive, typing yeilds detection of multi

Re: Beagle on encrypted partitions yeilds horrible system performance

2008-03-26 Thread Debajyoti Bera
> I am hitting kind of a nasty performance problem, my current test setup is > a two disk mdraid RAID0 setup with lvm ontop of a dmcrypt, all partitions > beagle touches are ext4. Now every time beagle 0.3.4 indexes a folder, the > entire system becomes near non responsive, typing yeilds detection

Re: Beagle on encrypted partitions yeilds horrible system performance

2008-03-26 Thread Joe Shaw
Hi, On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 11:12 AM, Debajyoti Bera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I am hitting kind of a nasty performance problem, my current test setup is > > a two disk mdraid RAID0 setup with lvm ontop of a dmcrypt, all partitions > > beagle touches are ext4. Now every time beagle 0.3.4 in

Re: Beagle on encrypted partitions yeilds horrible system performance

2008-03-26 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 11:54 -0400, Joe Shaw wrote: > > I would be interested in knowing if other similarly IO-heavy > operations (like "find /") are also CPU bound. Probably a more accurate representation would be: find -type f -exec cat {} >/dev/null \; So that the content of files is read, r

Re: Beagle on encrypted partitions yeilds horrible system performance

2008-03-29 Thread drago01
David Nielsen wrote: > As Fedora now proposes encryption by default as of F9 during install, > this would be a spanner in the works for enabling beagle provided the > impact can't be lessened. Afaik its only enabled by default in the prerelease versions for testing and should be opt in for the