Hey Kevin,
On 14/12/2007, Kevin Kubasik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What (if any) major parts of the Xesam interface are we missing? Or do
> we implement poorly? If we are 100%, that's awesome, but if not, I
> want to look into getting us completely compliant so we can push
> nautilus/gtkfilechoo
What (if any) major parts of the Xesam interface are we missing? Or do
we implement poorly? If we are 100%, that's awesome, but if not, I
want to look into getting us completely compliant so we can push
nautilus/gtkfilechooser supporting Xesam, not individual API's.
On Dec 13, 2007 11:27 AM, Arun
On 13/12/2007, Anders Rune Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> With the new libbeagle interface he is a patch that implements the
> missing inSet keyword in the Xesam interface.
Modified a bit and committed (r4280). Thanks!
--
Arun Raghavan
(http://nemesis.accosted.net)
v2sw5Chw4+5ln4pr6$O
Hi
With the new libbeagle interface he is a patch that implements the
missing inSet keyword in the Xesam interface.
--
Anders Rune Jensen
http://people.iola.dk/anders/
Index: src/Parser.cs
===
--- src/Parser.cs (revision 4279)
+++ s
