Hi,
On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 09:21 +0200, Joost Kraaijeveld wrote:
Is there anyone else who monitors this thread that is missing the
mails?
I am away at GUADEC and not following email very closely.
And could anyone inform me on the final verdict concerning my question,
based on the mails?
We
Is there anyone else who monitors this thread that is missing the
mails?
I am away at GUADEC and not following email very closely.
And could anyone inform me on the final verdict concerning my question,
based on the mails?
We don't support wildcard searches today. We're not using
On Dienstag 27 Juni 2006 04:24, Adrian Sai-wah Tam wrote:
Actually, I agree that having partial string match is difficult (in
terms of computational complexity) and not possible due to performance
reasons.
Lucene can do these kind of queries, using the WildcardQuery class. Just
note that at
Hi,
On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 09:05 +0200, Daniel Naber wrote:
On Dienstag 27 Juni 2006 04:24, Adrian Sai-wah Tam wrote:
Actually, I agree that having partial string match is difficult (in
terms of computational complexity) and not possible due to performance
reasons.
Lucene can do these
Hi
Is it correct that Beagle does not match partial string, e.g. if I
search for Beagle it will not find Beagle, or if i search for AQueue
it wil not find AQueue ?
If that is correct, is there a way that I can get what I want (searching
with partial strings)?
Yes. Beagle doesnot allow
Hi,
Actually, I agree that having partial string match is difficult (in
terms of computational complexity) and not possible due to performance
reasons. However, I see that there might have a demand on this.
Further more, as a Chinese speaker, I want to point out that, partial
string match is
