One of the reaons (actually, the only
reason) I asked people to delete ~/.beagle if they were using trunk from
before :)
Ahh, the ... M-word, read the Manual. Sorry...
BTW, in the list of debug tips I mailed yesterday, the heap-shot tip is last
resort and requires extra effort. The tips
Hi,
On Nov 16, 2007 8:28 AM, Nirbheek Chauhan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 16, 2007 2:53 AM, Bjørn Haagensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
4. Could there be an option for collapsing all hits in the webinterface ?
Why exactly do you need an option for collapsing all the hits in the
guessing the problem was caused by some error in my user Daemon.xml
and/or FilesQueryable.xml causing the system-wide configuration files
not to be read. They have been carried through since a long time ago,
so perhaps somewhere along the line an update to beagle-settings have
been
Hi,
I'm running the pre-beta released tarball of libbeagle and beagle SVN
under Ubuntu Gutsy. It's looking nice. But ...
1. when using the beagle backend nautilus search crashes. In
.xsession-errors I get:
nautilus: symbol lookup error: nautilus: undefined symbol:
beagle_query_add_hit_type
I
1. when using the beagle backend nautilus search crashes. In
.xsession-errors I get:
nautilus: symbol lookup error: nautilus: undefined symbol:
beagle_query_add_hit_type
libbeagle API changed in 0.3.0 - the changes were minor but ilbbeagle
clients need to be rebuilt with libbeagle1.so.0
Hi,
On Nov 15, 2007 10:45 PM, D Bera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
libbeagle API changed in 0.3.0 - the changes were minor but ilbbeagle
clients need to be rebuilt with libbeagle1.so.0 (instead of
libbeagle0.so.0)
Oh well. I'll try that. Luckily it's so easy in Ubuntu, so if
rebuilding nautilus
3. Beagle indexes dot-files- and directories. Is this a new feature?
Why? Was there a discussion on the list about this?
Are you sure about this one ? dot-files and directories should not be
indexed! Do you get those in search results ?
Pretty much so. I thought it was very strange.
On Nov 16, 2007 2:53 AM, Bjørn Haagensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
4. Could there be an option for collapsing all hits in the webinterface ?
Why exactly do you need an option for collapsing all the hits in the
webinterface? I'm not asking this because I think there shouldn't be
one, but to see
On Sat, 2006-04-22 at 19:18 -0400, Carlos Moffat wrote:
On Sat, 2006-04-22 at 19:09 -0400, D Bera wrote:
3612 cmoffat 15 0 77728 39m 8220 S 19.0 2.6 20:46.95
beagled-helper
By the way, could you send me your numbers for top? I'd like to have a
reference.
I am away
Part of this might be related to the issue we had with TermBuffers not
being thread safe. Could you update to 0.2.5 and see if there is any
change?
-Kevin Kubasik
On 4/23/06, Carlos Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2006-04-22 at 19:18 -0400, Carlos Moffat wrote:
On Sat, 2006-04-22 at
Hi,
I'm using beagle 0.2.4 from Debian/Sid. Although the last version hasn't
reached Debian yet, I wanted to ask about memory usage. Right now,
beagled is using 55+ of all the memory (I have 1.5GB total). That seems
like a lot, and as it's causing my computer to choke (specially with
some CPU
I'm using beagle 0.2.4 from Debian/Sid. Although the last version hasn't
reached Debian yet, I wanted to ask about memory usage. Right now,
beagled is using 55+ of all the memory (I have 1.5GB total). That seems
like a lot, and as it's causing my computer to choke (specially with
some CPU
top - 18:16:27 up 5:32, 2 users, load average: 0.61, 0.94, 1.02
Tasks: 2 total, 0 running, 2 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 59.0% us, 8.7% sy, 0.0% ni, 24.3% id, 7.7% wa, 0.3% hi,
0.0% si
Mem: 1554852k total, 1474592k used,80260k free,28104k buffers
Swap:
On Sat, 2006-04-22 at 18:35 -0400, D Bera wrote:
top - 18:16:27 up 5:32, 2 users, load average: 0.61, 0.94, 1.02
Tasks: 2 total, 0 running, 2 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 59.0% us, 8.7% sy, 0.0% ni, 24.3% id, 7.7% wa, 0.3% hi,
0.0% si
Mem: 1554852k total,
On Sat, 2006-04-22 at 18:35 -0400, D Bera wrote:
top - 18:16:27 up 5:32, 2 users, load average: 0.61, 0.94, 1.02
Tasks: 2 total, 0 running, 2 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 59.0% us, 8.7% sy, 0.0% ni, 24.3% id, 7.7% wa, 0.3% hi,
0.0% si
Mem: 1554852k total,
On Sat, 2006-04-22 at 19:09 -0400, D Bera wrote:
3612 cmoffat 15 0 77728 39m 8220 S 19.0 2.6 20:46.95
beagled-helper
By the way, could you send me your numbers for top? I'd like to have a
reference.
I am away from my laptop. But my figures for helper and beagled are
that I could provide that may help in tracking
down what is causing this runaway memory usage?
Did you also run it with --debug-memory? If so, please email the
~/.beagle/Log/current-Beagle log to me.
Joe
___
Dashboard-hackers mailing list
Dashboard
Did you also run it with --debug-memory? If so, please email the
~/.beagle/Log/current-Beagle log to me.
I am doing so now. I am currently using mono-1.1.8.2. Could I resolve
this problem by upgrading to 1.1.9?
Greg
___
Dashboard-hackers
Check out the discussion (currently going on) at
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/dashboard-hackers/2005-September/msg00069.html
___
Dashboard-hackers mailing list
Dashboard-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dashboard-hackers
Hi,
On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 15:33 -0400, Gregory Pierce wrote:
Beagle has been working great. I am very pleased with it overall;
however, I am concerned about its memory usage. The gnome system monitor
indicates that it is up to 1.1 GB of memory and that swap space (~1GB)
is at 100% usage
Hi,
On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 17:55 -0400, Gregory Pierce wrote:
I am not sure what to look for. I just typed beagled --debug-memory
--allow-backend and before this I deleted the .beagle directory. Will
this restart the indexing process again? And how can I tell whether the
problem is in Files
On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 18:02 -0400, Joe Shaw wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 17:55 -0400, Gregory Pierce wrote:
I am not sure what to look for. I just typed beagled --debug-memory
--allow-backend and before this I deleted the .beagle directory. Will
this restart the indexing process
suggested (beagled --allow-backend Files) and
mono-beagled is up to 601 MB of resident memory! So, as you suspected,
it is the Files backend that is at least partly responsible. Is there
any other information that I could provide that may help in tracking
down what is causing this runaway memory
Hello Everybody
Howdy,
Best is occupying too much memory,
currently 80 MB,
Fresh start, and nothing searched in it, it is sitting in systray,
in my top list Mozilla Firefox (is also not a native application) only managed
to exeed best in occupying more memory,
everything else (even Gimp2, Kmail)
24 matches
Mail list logo
