Hi Sebastian,
On 8/20/07, Sebastian Pölsterl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It seems to me that we're facing the same kind of problems: No time, to
> little manpower and a lot features that want to get implemented.
> Therefore, I suggest that the beagle-live handler stays in Deskbar and
> you keep u
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joe Shaw schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> On 8/20/07, Sebastian Pölsterl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> You're right, it isn't guaranteed that each beagle user uses deskbar as
>> well, but he has at least the option. Because Deskbar is part of gnome
>> it should be
Hi,
On 8/20/07, Sebastian Pölsterl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You're right, it isn't guaranteed that each beagle user uses deskbar as
> well, but he has at least the option. Because Deskbar is part of gnome
> it should be installed by default in most distros. Therefore, I think it
> makes more s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> dont see why it makes a difference. Users using beagle will not
>necessarily use deskbar (and hence beagle live handler). Similarly, the
>handler will not have similar releases or changes as frequently as
>beagle. So, even if it was hosted under /svn
> As you can see on in the topic I wanted to know of you're willing to
> move the beagle handlers (or maybe only the beagle-live handler) to
> beagle. This makes sense, because if someone decides to install beagle
> s/he will get the deskbar plugin as well. Without beagle it's just lying
> around d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
As you can see on in the topic I wanted to know of you're willing to
move the beagle handlers (or maybe only the beagle-live handler) to
beagle. This makes sense, because if someone decides to install beagle
s/he will get the deskbar plugin as wel
