Re: datetime.perl.org

2003-02-02 Thread Adam Turoff
On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 11:30:46AM +0100, Peter J. Acklam wrote: I suggest adding links to the ISO 8601:2000 Final Draft. The W3C has a distillation of ISO 8601 billed as date time formats for the web or somesuch. I'm sure there are similar passages from the IETF as well. Z.

Floating time zone = non-floating

2003-02-02 Thread Dave Rolsky
If I have a datetime object with a floating time zone and then I set the time zone to some non-floating zone, I shouldn't change the local time, right? -dave /*=== House Absolute Consulting www.houseabsolute.com ===*/

Re: Floating time zone = non-floating

2003-02-02 Thread Dave Rolsky
On Sun, 2 Feb 2003, Dave Rolsky wrote: If I have a datetime object with a floating time zone and then I set the time zone to some non-floating zone, I shouldn't change the local time, right? And how about non-floating = floating? Same thing, no adjustment, right? -dave

Re: Floating time zone = non-floating

2003-02-02 Thread Bruce Van Allen
On Sunday, February 2, 2003, at 02:42 PM, Dave Rolsky wrote: On Sun, 2 Feb 2003, Dave Rolsky wrote: If I have a datetime object with a floating time zone and then I set the time zone to some non-floating zone, I shouldn't change the local time, right? And how about non-floating =

Re: Grand Unified Theory of Date/Time modules

2003-02-02 Thread abigail
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 02:37:31PM +1100, Rick Measham wrote: There are two time periods that do not change: Years (time the earth takes to travel around the sun) and Days (time the earth take to spin one complete revolution). But they do change. If the length of a day was constant, we would