Jonas B.Nielsen wrote:
>
> Well I really the general idea of a
DateTime::Calc::Namespace, but I
> think the case of DateTime::Pregnancy
(Date::Pregnancy now) really
> shows the difficulty of generalizing such a thing.
>
> In calculating a date a of birth I currently have
knowledge of 3
> diffe
+-le 13/10/2004 11:29 -0500, Dave Rolsky a dit :
| 0.30 2004-10-13
|
| - This release is based on version 2004d of the Olson database.
^
Should read :e
other than that, it's fine :-)
--
Mathieu Arnold
pgpr4CwIm0sgL.pgp
D
Hello,
Well I really the general idea of a DateTime::Calc::Namespace, but I
think the case of DateTime::Pregnancy (Date::Pregnancy now) really
shows the difficulty of generalizing such a thing.
In calculating a date a of birth I currently have knowledge of 3
different methods. They all differ a