On Sun, 31 Jul 2005, Eugene van der Pijll wrote:
Dave Rolsky schreef:
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/05210/545823.stm
Unfortunately it wouldn't make DT.pm any simpler, since we'd still have
the existing leap seconds to account for.
And we'd have to implement leap hours in UTC... (Though not
Dave Rolsky schreef:
> http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/05210/545823.stm
>
> Unfortunately it wouldn't make DT.pm any simpler, since we'd still have
> the existing leap seconds to account for.
And we'd have to implement leap hours in UTC... (Though not for a couple
of hundred years, so you might j
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/05210/545823.stm
Unfortunately it wouldn't make DT.pm any simpler, since we'd still have
the existing leap seconds to account for.
-dave
/*===
VegGuide.Orgwww.BookIRead.com
Your guide to al
