Re: DateTime performance

2006-01-18 Thread Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 06:21:54PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: One might hope that a script like this: test3 #!/usr/bin/perl BEGIN { no lib qw|/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/ lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/

Re: DateTime performance

2006-01-18 Thread Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 08:38:13AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Then no lib isn't doing what you want. Agree. But, that is the point. Outside of recompiling perl with new paths or significantly altering DateTime to use far fewer dependancies nothing can really be done. test4

Re: DateTime performance

2006-01-18 Thread matthew
Then no lib isn't doing what you want. Agree. But, that is the point. Outside of recompiling perl with new paths or significantly altering DateTime to use far fewer dependancies nothing can really be done. test4 #!/usr/bin/perl BEGIN { @INC = grep !/5\.8\.[0-5]/, @INC } use DateTime;

Re: DateTime performance

2006-01-18 Thread matthew
Do your traces show it still searching all the removed paths? yes There's no way the above should be doing that, unless you're loading DateTime earlier, via sitecustomize.pl or $PERL5OPT? Neither of the items you have identified are used in any way during these tests. I would expect if

XS Leap second questions

2006-01-18 Thread Chase Venters
Greetings fellow Perl hackers, I'm attracted to DateTime's very comprehensive approach at dealing with time (which I personally consider to be one of the biggest annoyances and challenges in programming). Unfortunately, I've been plagued by an oddity in the way DateTime handles