(sorry, didn't send to the list)
--- Begin Message ---
Rich Bowen wrote:
> I'm unclear how this is any less accurate than having a strictly seconds
> based method, and it means that we can store a wider range of dates in a
> smaller number.
Ok, I agree on using rata_die :)
Martijn van Beers wrot
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, fglock wrote:
> Martijn van Beers wrote:
> > Also, Date::Set does need some changes anyway, since it still relies
> > on the epoch. So Date::Set is already using a dumb base class, only
> > it isn't an explicit class, just a number.
>
> I could write a DateTime::Set, which wou
