On 20 Jul 2003 22:53:00 +0200, Claus Färber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tim Bunce [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb/wrote:
The DBI has a (currently private) method to determine the underlying
database type. It was borrowed from DBIx::AnyDBD. Take a look at
_dbtype_names() in DBI.pm
Yeah, I just updated
Tim Bunce [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb/wrote:
The DBI has a (currently private) method to determine the underlying
database type. It was borrowed from DBIx::AnyDBD. Take a look at
_dbtype_names() in DBI.pm
Yeah, I just updated DT::F::DBI to use that function.
I intend to extend it to use
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 01:58:37AM -1000, Joshua Hoblitt wrote:
Well, there are only two modules: DT::F::MySQL and DT::F::Pg.
I'd really like to see a lot more database formatters.
I'm willing to do DT::F::DB2.
That still leaves several major DB's unsupported:
Oracle
SQL Server
Well, there are only two modules: DT::F::MySQL and DT::F::Pg.
I'd really like to see a lot more database formatters.
I'm willing to do DT::F::DB2.
That still leaves several major DB's unsupported:
Oracle
SQL Server
Sybase
And all the minors:
mSQL
SQLite
InterBase
Pheonix
SAPs DB
Access???
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Joshua Hoblitt wrote:
Pheonix
First of all, it's Phoenix, and second of all, you're thinking of
Firebird. Don't get that name wrong or they'll come down on you like a
ton of bricks ;)
-dave
/*===
House Absolute Consulting
www.houseabsolute.com
Joshua Hoblitt schreef:
Well, there are only two modules: DT::F::MySQL and DT::F::Pg.
I'd really like to see a lot more database formatters.
snip 10 other databases
Do all of these have different datetime formats? If database X has the
same formats as e.g. Pg, it doesn't need a separate
First of all, it's Phoenix, and second of all, you're thinking of
Firebird. Don't get that name wrong or they'll come down on you like a
ton of bricks ;)
Your right - I'd been traveling for 24 hours. :)
-J
--
Joshua Hoblitt schreef:
Do all of these have different datetime formats? If database X has the
same formats as e.g. Pg, it doesn't need a separate format. Of course
DT::F::DBI should know about these cases.
If X has identical date/time handling as Pg I'd like to see DT::F::X
be isa
There was a recent thread out on perlmonks regarding the functionality of
DT::F::DBI:
http://www.perlmonks.org/index.pl?node_id=274054
Basically the user did not realize they were dealing with a factory and that the
API was actually documented, in their case, in DT::F::MySQL.
Perhaps a note in
