Re: Data::Juxtapose 0.01 [Re: patch: DateTime::TimeZone PP redundant structures]

2005-07-18 Thread Daisuke Maki
> The basic format seems good. I'm not sure about using weak_ref, though > -- what if an object or structure falls out of scope, yet there's still > a key in the data registry? If another ref comes along whose fingerprint > matches that key, does it end up getting replaced with undef ? (I'm kind >

Re: Data::Juxtapose 0.01 [Re: patch: DateTime::TimeZone PP redundant structures]

2005-07-18 Thread Matt Sisk
The basic format seems good. I'm not sure about using weak_ref, though -- what if an object or structure falls out of scope, yet there's still a key in the data registry? If another ref comes along whose fingerprint matches that key, does it end up getting replaced with undef ? (I'm kind of sleepy

Data::Juxtapose 0.01 [Re: patch: DateTime::TimeZone PP redundant structures]

2005-07-18 Thread Daisuke Maki
Here's the repackaged Data-Juxtapose. I added the use of Scalar::Util (if available) just in case. http://www.wafu.ne.jp/~daisuke/Data-Juxtapose-0.01.tar.gz Let me know if there are any problems. If I don't hear anything, I'll probably upload it to CPAN tomorrow. --d