On Feb 24, 2004, at 9:44 PM, Dave Rolsky wrote:
I felt
uncomfortable telling them to wait for M::B 0.24 with no release
timeframe, because Ken went on vacation right after release 0.23.
Ken's on vacation _again_?? Damn!
D
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, David Wheeler wrote:
> 1. Every one of us who has Module::Build built modules can release new
> versions with the Makefile.PL generated by Module::Build 0.23, which
> will not have this problem. Or
>
> 2. Wait for the release of Module::Build 0.24, which corrects the
> problem
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004, Rick Measham wrote:
> >You think MakeMaker is robust? Hahahahahaha
> >
> >That's funny.
>
> And that's rude.
>
> There absolutely no need for rudeness here. I had a problem, I
> described the problem. Rather than responding to the problem you
> belittle me ... I don't underst
On Feb 24, 2004, at 8:42 PM, Rick Measham wrote:
Thankyou for a sensible response David. While MakeMaker's maintainer
and others may say long live Module::Build, I keep having trouble with
it whereas I've never had trouble with MakeMaker. Thus my question.
Yes, this was due to an oversight Ken m
At 9:02 pm -0600 2004-02-24, Dave Rolsky wrote:
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004, Rick Measham wrote:
I can't give more technical info at this point except that I need to
install Module::Build before I install anything that depends on it.
I'll be doing another virgin install later in the week if you're
int
At 8:39 pm -0800 2004-02-24, David Wheeler wrote:
On Feb 24, 2004, at 7:02 PM, Dave Rolsky wrote:
But I'm led to ask: Is
Module::Build really robust enough to switch from MakeMaker to
Module::Build?
You think MakeMaker is robust? Hahahahahaha
That's funny.
What Dave is trying to say is, yes, Mod
On Feb 24, 2004, at 7:02 PM, Dave Rolsky wrote:
But I'm led to ask: Is
Module::Build really robust enough to switch from MakeMaker to
Module::Build?
You think MakeMaker is robust? Hahahahahaha
That's funny.
What Dave is trying to say is, yes, Module::Build is robust enough to
switch from MakeMa
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004, Rick Measham wrote:
> I can't give more technical info at this point except that I need to
> install Module::Build before I install anything that depends on it.
> I'll be doing another virgin install later in the week if you're
> interested in some sort of output. But I'm led
At 8:45 pm -0600 2004-02-24, Dave Rolsky wrote:
Module::Build 0.24 should be out soon, which will fix this problem.
Speaking of which .. when I install the module I really want (on a
virgin machine), letting CPAN handle dependencies:
cpan> install DateTime::Format::Strptime
I get a list of dep
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Christopher Pryce wrote:
> On Mac OSX ( darwin ) 10.2.8
>
> Perl Makefile.PL returns:
>
> perl Build.PL
> Checking whether your kit is complete...
> Looks good
> Deleting Build
> Removed previous script 'Build'
> Creating new 'Build' script for 'DateTime-Format-ICal' version '
On Mac OSX ( darwin ) 10.2.8
Perl Makefile.PL returns:
perl Build.PL
Checking whether your kit is complete...
Looks good
Deleting Build
Removed previous script 'Build'
Creating new 'Build' script for 'DateTime-Format-ICal' version '0.08'
Can't call method "find_perl_interpreter" on an undefined v
11 matches
Mail list logo
