Hi Dave.
Dave Rolsky wrote:
Ugh, my release management skills stink. Hopefully there won't be another
release with this many changes at once for a _long_ time (or better yet,
never!).
I still can't get the ppm to work in Windows:
C:\>ppm
PPM - Programmer's Package Manager version 3.0.1.
Co
Hi Cameron,
>
> I still can't get the ppm to work in Windows:
>
We have not yet build the ppm file as of yet (the new one)
I just installed it myself and I need to build it.
Ron Hill
[ moved ot the list ]
On Thu, 26 Jun 2003, Joshua Hoblitt wrote:
> In the case of DT::C::Egyptian inheritance makes a lot of since. The
> Gregorian calendar only needs minor tweaks to function as the Egyptian
> one. Why should everyone have to reinvent the entire wheel instead of
> sub-classing
> Hmm, this is a problem. I'm really not sure subclassing makes that much
> sense here. At the very least, you probably need to provide your own
> new() method.
The DT constructor is pretty large - not much fun.
> I'm really not sure how far (if at all) we should go in trying to make
> DateTime
On Thu, 26 Jun 2003, Joshua Hoblitt wrote:
> > Hmm, this is a problem. I'm really not sure subclassing makes that much
> > sense here. At the very least, you probably need to provide your own
> > new() method.
>
> The DT constructor is pretty large - not much fun.
It can be broken up into multi
> It can be broken up into multiple pieces. I certainly don't object to
> that.
Sounds reasonable.
> I'm really not convinced that subclasses should be using DateTime's new()
> method. Especially not a subclass for a calendar that has 13 months!
Well it worked because I redefined some of the s
