At 10:27 AM -0800 24/3/03, Hill, Ronald wrote:
Hi Dave,
[snipped]
I think the constructor should (at least optionally) take named
parameters, especially given that your 3rd parameter defaults
to undef, which is just a little weird. Named parameters have a number of
advantages:
[snipped]
OK,
On Sat, 22 Mar 2003, Rick Measham wrote:
> While I know that DateTime::Astro::Sunrise has been released, I wonder if it
> should not have been DateTime::Set::Sunrise?
>
> I figure that it is a set of DateTimes, albeit not like our regular sets
> (every Monday). If not DateTime::Set::Sunrise, then
Hi Rick,
>
> While I know that DateTime::Astro::Sunrise has been released,
> I wonder if it
> should not have been DateTime::Set::Sunrise?
Well, it is up to the group. I released this module as a development release
SO,
it should not be a problem with changing the name. BTW, before posting thi
