On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, fglock wrote:
> > You'd think 19700329T033000. And you'd be right most of the time,
> > but not if that time was a Europe/Amsterdam time. Then, it'd
> > be 19700329T043000.
> >
> > So, I think we need to either put all of this inside the base object,
> > or make the base objec
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 01:38:36PM -0500, Rich Bowen wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, fglock wrote:
>
> > About "Rata Die" and "Julian Day": I'd prefer a seconds-based
> > implementation, because leap seconds would make 'seconds' be a
> > varying fraction, in a day-based calendar.
>
> Seems to me th
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Rich Bowen wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, fglock wrote:
>
> > About "Rata Die" and "Julian Day": I'd prefer a seconds-based
> > implementation, because leap seconds would make 'seconds' be a
> > varying fraction, in a day-based calendar.
>
> Seems to me that there is a differen
