On Thu, 13 Feb 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Btw, as should be obvious from the last couple of emails, I spent the
evening plaing with DateTime, and I've very impressed. Thought I should
mention that as I send in a slew of bug reports.
Currently epoch() on DateTime.pm calculates the epoch
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, Dave Rolsky wrote:
Actually, I think it's correct. The UNIX epoch is seconds since January
1, 1970 00:00:00 GMT. So the GMT assumption is indeed correct.
But you are using Time::Local::timegm() to do the conversion. timegm() is
the inverse of gmtime() which returns the
Btw, as should be obvious from the last couple of emails, I spent the
evening plaing with DateTime, and I've very impressed. Thought I should
mention that as I send in a slew of bug reports.
Currently epoch() on DateTime.pm calculates the epoch incorrectly, it
assumes that all objects are stored
