Re: Re: Changing Machine ID

2009-04-26 Thread Jaya krishnan
Title: Samsung Enterprise Portal mySingle Manjunatha, Both the boot loader and the Kernel should have  the  same  machine ID. Otherwise the kernel won't boot. --Jayakrishnan     --- Original Message ---Sender : David BrownellDate : Apr 27, 2009 15:10 (GMT+09:00)Title : Re: Changi

RE: when port a software , bus error

2009-04-26 Thread Balagopalakrishnan, Anand
Zhenfeng, As Sid pointed out, the bus error is due to access of int32 data at non word aligned address. You have turned on structure packing with the #pragma directive. If this was not done, the compiler would have padded 3 bytes between the char 'm' and int 'data'. In that case, the int 'dat

Re: Changing Machine ID

2009-04-26 Thread David Brownell
On Sunday 26 April 2009, Manjunatha AM wrote: > > Hi > > I downloaded latest OS (linux-davinci-2.6-historic )from source.mvsta.com > and compiled it for Davinci DM6446 EVM with low level debug option selected. You have a pretty old version of U-Boot there ... > When I boot the board it gives b

RE: when port a software , bus error

2009-04-26 Thread Heroor, Siddharth
Hi, On Arm, you can access only word aligned data. To access a 32 bit value, the address needs to be 32 bit aligned etc.. If the data is not aligned, then a bus error is thrown. I'm guessing that its because of the char m, data[] will not be aligned in _test_c. Thanks and Regards, Sid +91-80

RE: DSPLINK: MSGQ_get() with WAIT_NONE arg causes freeze

2009-04-26 Thread Kamoolkar, Mugdha
Kelby, We found this issue recently, and it needs a fix in sync.c file. I will send it separately to you. Regards, Mugdha -Original Message- From: davinci-linux-open-source-boun...@linux.davincidsp.com [mailto:davinci-linux-open-source-boun...@linux.davincidsp.com] On Behalf Of Kelby

Re: Changing Machine ID

2009-04-26 Thread Sidharth Garde
Hi, AFAIK, the appropriate machine ID is selected at the time of compiling the available source code. If you are using the available makefile directly, then I suggest you go for recompilation with the appropriate machine ID option set ( - M i think) and enter your own machine ID. That will p

Changing Machine ID

2009-04-26 Thread Manjunatha AM
Hi I downloaded latest OS (linux-davinci-2.6-historic )from source.mvsta.com and compiled it for Davinci DM6446 EVM with low level debug option selected. When I boot the board it gives below error; * Starting kernel ... Uncompressing Linux...

DSPLINK: MSGQ_get() with WAIT_NONE arg causes freeze

2009-04-26 Thread Kelby Rogers
I am having trouble getting MSGQ_get() to work when set to non-blocking, i.e. with the parameter "WAIT_NONE". It works fine blocking. I am using dsplink 1.60, and testing on the DM6446 EVM. The symptom of the problem is the Linux OS freezes, requiring a reboot. I have isolated the problem with

Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot and CONFIG_SYS_DAVINCI_BROKEN_ECC

2009-04-26 Thread Hugo Villeneuve
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 16:56:40 -0700 David Brownell wrote: > On Sunday 26 April 2009, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > > > > > > Before I submit a patch to remove it from U-Boot GIT (nothing > > > > > there enables it, and it will nastify 4-bit support), I > > > > > thought I'd see if a

Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot and CONFIG_SYS_DAVINCI_BROKEN_ECC

2009-04-26 Thread David Brownell
On Sunday 26 April 2009, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > > > > Before I submit a patch to remove it from U-Boot GIT (nothing > > > > there enables it, and it will nastify 4-bit support), I thought > > > > I'd see if anyone knows exactly what software it was trying to > > > > emulate.  

U-Boot and CONFIG_SYS_DAVINCI_BROKEN_ECC

2009-04-26 Thread David Brownell
I was looking at the DaVinci NAND support in current U-Boot code (i.e. 2009.03 plus patches merged since that release), and am puzzled by the above-named config option. Before I submit a patch to remove it from U-Boot GIT (nothing there enables it, and it will nastify 4-bit support), I thought I'd

Re: Communicating with an external audio codec chip over UART

2009-04-26 Thread Steve Chen
On Sun, 2009-04-26 at 00:40 +0530, Kapil Pendse wrote: > Hello, > > Thanks for the inputs Steve. I'm using an older version of MVista, > with OSS. But your suggestion made be think in the right direction. > I'll be writing the voice processor's (ForteMedia 1182) driver within > the OSS framework.