Re: DM365 UBoot + NAND Query

2010-06-17 Thread Krunal Patil
Hi, The partition table information for the two NAND chips (each of 1GB, Blocksize 256KB) listed by kernel is as follows: Kernel Bootlog: = NAND device: Manufacturer ID: 0x2c, Chip ID: 0xd3 (Micron NAND 1GiB 3,3V 8-bit) 2 NAND chips detected Creating 5 MTD partitions on

Re: RE: [PATCH 14/14] davinci: video: davincifb Parallel RBG LCD management

2010-06-17 Thread Raffaele Recalcati
Hi Karicheri, 2010/6/16 Karicheri, Muralidharan m-kariche...@ti.com Hi, A snapshot of the work can be previewed at http://git.linuxtv.org/mkaricheri/vpfe-vpbe-video.git?a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/devel_2_6_35rc2 It is based on sub device interface. Currently we have ported the v4l2

RE: DM365 UBoot + NAND Query

2010-06-17 Thread Jon Povey
Krunal Patil wrote: NAND device: Manufacturer ID: 0x2c, Chip ID: 0xd3 (Micron NAND 1GiB 3,3V 8-bit) 2 NAND chips detected Creating 5 MTD partitions on nand_davinci.0: 0x-0x0078 : bootloader 0x0078-0x0080 : params 0x0080-0x00c0 : kernel 0x00c0-0x20c0 :

Shouldn't PINMUX configuration be board specific ?

2010-06-17 Thread Christophe Aeschlimann
Hi, I'm in the process of adapting the davinci kernel for a custom board based on the OMAP-L138 (da850). I was surprised to see that the PINMUX registers configuration (in da850.c) is SOC dependant (part of common initialisation). I think the PINMUX configuration is definitely a board

Re: Shouldn't PINMUX configuration be board specific ?

2010-06-17 Thread Caglar Akyuz
On Thursday 17 June 2010 11:43:27 am Christophe Aeschlimann wrote: Hi, I'm in the process of adapting the davinci kernel for a custom board based on the OMAP-L138 (da850). I was surprised to see that the PINMUX registers configuration (in da850.c) is SOC dependant (part of common

Re: Shouldn't PINMUX configuration be board specific ?

2010-06-17 Thread Christophe Aeschlimann
Le 17.06.2010 10:53, Caglar Akyuz a écrit : On Thursday 17 June 2010 11:43:27 am Christophe Aeschlimann wrote: Hi, I'm in the process of adapting the davinci kernel for a custom board based on the OMAP-L138 (da850). I was surprised to see that the PINMUX registers configuration (in

Re: Shouldn't PINMUX configuration be board specific ?

2010-06-17 Thread Sergei Shtylyov
Hello. Christophe Aeschlimann wrote: I'm in the process of adapting the davinci kernel for a custom board based on the OMAP-L138 (da850). Are you planning to submit your work here? I was surprised to see that the PINMUX registers configuration (in da850.c) is SOC dependant (part of

Re: Shouldn't PINMUX configuration be board specific ?

2010-06-17 Thread Thomas Koeller
On Thursday 17 June 2010 11:22:29 Christophe Aeschlimann wrote: Actually it is not SoC specific. Possible pinmux configurations are defined in SoC specific files, then they are adjusted in board specific files using 'davinci_cfg_reg' which is defined in mach/mux.h. Indeed. Thanks for the

Re: Shouldn't PINMUX configuration be board specific ?

2010-06-17 Thread Christophe Aeschlimann
Le 17.06.2010 11:36, Sergei Shtylyov a écrit : Hello. Christophe Aeschlimann wrote: I'm in the process of adapting the davinci kernel for a custom board based on the OMAP-L138 (da850). Are you planning to submit your work here? If I do anything that could be useful for the community I

Re: [spi-devel-general] [PATCH 0/3] davinci: spi: replace existing SPI driver

2010-06-17 Thread Grant Likely
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Brian Niebuhr bnieb...@efjohnson.com wrote: Can you please post this series to SPI development list (spi-devel-gene...@lists.sourceforge.net) CCing the maintainers David Brownell and Grant Likely? Done I had to go looking for these patches. I see that you

Re: DM355 codecs on git kernel.

2010-06-17 Thread xulei
Hi Siles, I am working on DM365 with dvsdk 3.10.00.16 and 2.6.32-rc2. When I trying to run the encode demo, I met the same problem with you: @25,694,740us: [+0 T:0x4001fce0] CE - Engine_open Enter('encode', 0x0, 0xbec58a6c) @25,694,995us: [+0 T:0x4001fce0] OM - Memory_alloc Enter(0x2c)

Re: DM365 UBoot + NAND Query

2010-06-17 Thread Steve Poulsen
Krunal, You might try this: 1) Use hexdump to view the first bit of the bootloader and note the data values. 2) Load a filesystem into filesystem2. 3) Use hexdump to view the first bit of the bootloader and note the changes. 4) hexdump filesystem2 and search for the pattern. ( you might dump

Re: Shouldn't PINMUX configuration be board specific ?

2010-06-17 Thread Sergei Shtylyov
Christophe Aeschlimann wrote: I was surprised to see that the PINMUX registers configuration (in da850.c) is SOC dependant (part of common initialisation). Frankly speaking, I don't see where the pin lists are a part of common initialization. Unless you mean da850_pins[] -- that is SoC

Re: Shouldn't PINMUX configuration be board specific ?

2010-06-17 Thread Christophe Aeschlimann
Le 17.06.2010 16:12, Sergei Shtylyov a écrit : Christophe Aeschlimann wrote: I was surprised to see that the PINMUX registers configuration (in da850.c) is SOC dependant (part of common initialisation). Frankly speaking, I don't see where the pin lists are a part of common initialization.

Re: Shouldn't PINMUX configuration be board specific ?

2010-06-17 Thread jean-philippe francois
 - The description of alternative PINMUX configuration takes place in da850_pins[] in da850.c  - Group of pins that describe a new feature can be defined in the board-specific file (so they can be enabled in one call) New features should be defined in the SoC file, because your board might

Re: Shouldn't PINMUX configuration be board specific ?

2010-06-17 Thread Christophe Aeschlimann
Le 17.06.2010 17:02, jean-philippe francois a écrit : - The description of alternative PINMUX configuration takes place in da850_pins[] in da850.c - Group of pins that describe a new feature can be defined in the board-specific file (so they can be enabled in one call) New features should

RE: Shouldn't PINMUX configuration be board specific ?

2010-06-17 Thread Nori, Sekhar
Hi Sergei, On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 19:42:11, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: Christophe Aeschlimann wrote: I was surprised to see that the PINMUX registers configuration (in da850.c) is SOC dependant (part of common initialisation). Frankly speaking, I don't see where the pin lists are a part of

Re: Kernel v2.6.34 SPI USB

2010-06-17 Thread Nicolas Luna
Hello, Is there anyone else that tried to modify platform data (board-da850-evm.c) to add USB1.1 and USB2.0 support for OMAP-L138? Thanks Nicolas On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Nori, Sekhar nsek...@ti.com wrote: Hi Nicolas, On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 21:22:55, Nicolas Luna wrote: Sergei,

RE: RE: [PATCH 14/14] davinci: video: davincifb Parallel RBG LCD management

2010-06-17 Thread Karicheri, Muralidharan
Raffaele, You got the readme.txt right! Arago tree has the latest video drivers for DM365. But this is a temporary staging tree that has all of the video drivers up ported from the MV kernel. Some of these drivers (vpfe capture on DM6446, DM355, DM365 and vpif capture and display on DM646x)

RE: DM365 UBoot + NAND Query

2010-06-17 Thread Jon Povey
Steve Poulsen wrote: 1) Use hexdump to view the first bit of the bootloader and note the data values. 2) Load a filesystem into filesystem2. 3) Use hexdump to view the first bit of the bootloader and note the changes. 4) hexdump filesystem2 and search for the pattern. ( you might dump it to

RE: Shouldn't PINMUX configuration be board specific ?

2010-06-17 Thread Jon Povey
Caglar Akyuz wrote: On Thursday 17 June 2010 11:43:27 am Christophe Aeschlimann wrote: I was surprised to see that the PINMUX registers configuration (in da850.c) is SOC dependant (part of common initialisation). I think the PINMUX configuration is definitely a board specific setting.

RE: Kernel v2.6.34 SPI USB

2010-06-17 Thread Subbrathnam, Swaminathan
Nicolas, You could refer to the OMAPL kernel tree in the Arago git page. That tree supports both L137 an L138 platforms including usb. regards swami From: davinci-linux-open-source-boun...@linux.davincidsp.com

RE: Shouldn't PINMUX configuration be board specific ?

2010-06-17 Thread David Brownell
In answer to the question in $SUBJECT: the whole pinmux configuration, yes. But Quite a lot of it can also be derived from driver configuration. (Which is board-coupled.) So (a partly made up example) if a given SPI bus is configured, with two chipselect lines active ... that rules out PINMUX

Re: DM365 UBoot + NAND Query

2010-06-17 Thread Krunal Patil
Thanks for the valuable suggestions guys. Appreciate all your inputs. I will be trying this today. -- Regards, Krunal On 06/18/2010 03:20 AM, Jon Povey wrote: Steve Poulsen wrote: 1) Use hexdump to view the first bit of the bootloader and note the data values. 2) Load a filesystem into

Re: RE: [PATCH 14/14] davinci: video: davincifb Parallel RBG LCD management

2010-06-17 Thread Raffaele Recalcati
Hi Muralidharan, 2010/6/17 Karicheri, Muralidharan m-kariche...@ti.com Raffaele, You got the readme.txt right! :) I'm reading it. Arago tree has the latest video drivers for DM365. But this is a temporary staging tree that has all of the video drivers up ported from the MV kernel.