Hi Subhasish,
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 18:45:06, Subhasish Ghosh wrote:
>> >>The driver should probably just get sram
>> >> space through platform data so that it doesn't depend on the
>> >> platform specific sram allocation function.
>>
>> Are you suggesting that I go back to that implementat
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 01:31:35PM -0400, Michael Williamson wrote:
> The davinci-i2c bus driver currently supports being probed with a NULL
> platform_data structure by using a default configuration when none is
> provided. However, the i2c_davinci_calc_clk_dividers does not
> check the provided
Hi Manjunath,
On Tuesday 26 April 2011 16:47:45 Hadli, Manjunath wrote:
> Laurent,
> Can you please review the patches with your suggestions from :
> http://git.linuxtv.org/mhadli/v4l-dvb-davinci_devices.git?a=shortlog;h=refs
> /heads/forkhilman2 and let me know if you think all your suggestions
Hi Mr. Dooks,
On 5/2/2011 5:36 AM, Ben Dooks wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 01:31:35PM -0400, Michael Williamson wrote:
>> The davinci-i2c bus driver currently supports being probed with a NULL
>> platform_data structure by using a default configuration when none is
>> provided. However, the i
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 14:04:11, Subhasish Ghosh wrote:
> >> SG - So, should I call the sram_alloc() in the platform setup function.
> >
> > Can you please shed some light on how SRAM
> > is being used in the driver? Looking at the
> > driver, it looks like it is used as a shared
> > buffer bet
