Re: pm loss development

2011-05-13 Thread Raffaele Recalcati
Hi Rafael, 2011/5/12 Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl: On Thursday, May 12, 2011, Raffaele Recalcati wrote: What happen normally in runtime pm implementation is that every devices are switched off and are enabled only when needed. In our case instead we have a completely functional embedded

Re: [RFC PATCH v3] Consolidate SRAM support

2011-05-13 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 09:30:14AM +0200, Jean Pihet wrote: On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 7:45 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote: This version fixes the davinci pm free, and adds updates for the davinci pcm driver. As I don't know what's happening with Jean's

Re: [RFC PATCH v3] Consolidate SRAM support

2011-05-13 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
Russell, On 5/12/2011 11:15 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 02:06:07PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: This is work in progress. Tried this patch on OMAP and found couple of issues. 1. Compilation break. Below is the fix for the same. diff --git

linphone porting for dm36x

2011-05-13 Thread 김용일
Hi everyone I am trying to find linphone(voip application)porting for DM365 TI DSP please informe me___ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list Davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com

Re: [PATCH v4 01/11] mfd: add pruss mfd driver.

2011-05-13 Thread Subhasish Ghosh
Ok, thanks for the clarification. Instead of passing the device name, will it be ok to pass the mfd_id. The benefit will be that I can use the ID directly as an array index for the mfd_cell entries. I think a device name would be clearer here, especially in order to avoid conflicts when the

Re: [PATCH v4 08/11] tty: add pruss SUART driver

2011-05-13 Thread Subhasish Ghosh
Say, if the driver is loaded as a module. If I allocate the sram in the platform code, how to I free it when the driver is unloaded. This is what I said in my last e-mail. What is the issue you see with this approach? | Thanks for the clarification. In this case, the driver | should use

Re: pm loss development

2011-05-13 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, May 13, 2011, Raffaele Recalcati wrote: Hi Rafael, 2011/5/12 Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl: On Thursday, May 12, 2011, Raffaele Recalcati wrote: What happen normally in runtime pm implementation is that every devices are switched off and are enabled only when needed. In our

[PATCH 2/2] [RFC] da850evm: enable mcasp ping-pong buffers

2011-05-13 Thread Ben Gardiner
The davinci--mcasp driver will copy the platform data specified sram_size's and eventq's. Set the eventq's and sram size for da850 and disable CONFIG_SUSPEND so that there is SRAM enough left for the McASP (until the patch to allocate sram from the 128K shared RAM region, then there should be

[PATCH 1/2] [RFC] ASoC: davinci-mcasp: enable ping-pong SRAM buffers

2011-05-13 Thread Ben Gardiner
The davinci-i2s driver copies the platform data for playback and capture sram sizes which is in turn used by davinci-pcm to allocate ping-pong buffers. Copy also the platform data in the davinci-mcasp probe(). Not-signed-off-by: Ben Gardiner bengardi...@nanometrics.ca ---

[PATCH RFC 0/2] da850 mcasp playback ping-pong buffers don't work

2011-05-13 Thread Ben Gardiner
Hi All, I've been testing playback on the da850evm. The good news is on 2.6.39-rc7 playback works fine. The bad news is that if the patches in the series are applied -- playback does not work. The first patch copies the sram-size platform data to the dma parameters used by davinci-pcm the