Re: [PATCH] DaVinci: add support for CPPI 4.1 (take 2)

2009-04-15 Thread Kevin Hilman
Sergei Shtylyov sshtyl...@ru.mvista.com writes: Add support for Texas Instuments Communication Port Programming Interface 4.1 (CPPI 4.1) used on OMAP-L137/DA830. At this moment, only the DMA controller and queue manager are supported. Support for the buffer manager is lacking but this chip

Re: [PATCH] DaVinci: add support for CPPI 4.1 (take 2)

2009-04-15 Thread Sergei Shtylyov
Hello. Kevin Hilman wrote: Add support for Texas Instuments Communication Port Programming Interface 4.1 (CPPI 4.1) used on OMAP-L137/DA830. At this moment, only the DMA controller and queue manager are supported. Support for the buffer manager is lacking but this chip doesn't have it anyway.

Re: [PATCH] DaVinci: add support for CPPI 4.1 (take 2)

2009-04-15 Thread Kevin Hilman
Sergei Shtylyov sshtyl...@ru.mvista.com writes: Hello. Kevin Hilman wrote: Add support for Texas Instuments Communication Port Programming Interface 4.1 (CPPI 4.1) used on OMAP-L137/DA830. At this moment, only the DMA controller and queue manager are supported. Support for the buffer

Re: [PATCH] DaVinci: add support for CPPI 4.1

2009-03-30 Thread Sergei Shtylyov
Hello. Pedanekar, Hemant wrote: Add support for Texas Instuments Communication Port Programming Interface 4.1 (CPPI 4.1) used on OMAP-L137/DA830. At this moment, only the DMA controller and queue manager are supported. Support for the buffer manager is lacking but this chip doesn't have it

Re: [PATCH] DaVinci: add support for CPPI 4.1

2009-03-29 Thread Pedanekar, Hemant
Hello, Sergei Shtylyov sshtyl...@ru.mvista.com writes: Add support for Texas Instuments Communication Port Programming Interface 4.1 (CPPI 4.1) used on OMAP-L137/DA830. At this moment, only the DMA controller and queue manager are supported. Support for the buffer manager is lacking but

Re: [PATCH] DaVinci: add support for CPPI 4.1

2009-03-25 Thread Sergei Shtylyov
David Brownell wrote: I was just trying to outline the large difference between 3.0 and 4.1 that warrants a new driver, so I'm not sure why TI people started to argue... I think the pushback was on your statement that they're so different as to be incompatible through the only programming

Re: [PATCH] DaVinci: add support for CPPI 4.1

2009-03-25 Thread Kevin Hilman
Sergei Shtylyov sshtyl...@ru.mvista.com writes: Add support for Texas Instuments Communication Port Programming Interface 4.1 (CPPI 4.1) used on OMAP-L137/DA830. At this moment, only the DMA controller and queue manager are supported. Support for the buffer manager is lacking but this chip

Re: [PATCH] DaVinci: add support for CPPI 4.1

2009-03-24 Thread Sergei Shtylyov
David Brownell wrote: I was just trying to outline the large difference between 3.0 and 4.1 that warrants a new driver, so I'm not sure why TI people started to argue... I think the pushback was on your statement that they're so different as to be incompatible through the only programming

Re: [PATCH] DaVinci: add support for CPPI 4.1

2009-03-24 Thread Sergei Shtylyov
Kevin Hilman wrote: I was just trying to outline the large difference between 3.0 and 4.1 that warrants a new driver, so I'm not sure why TI people started to argue... I think the pushback was on your statement that they're so different as to be incompatible through the only programming

Re: [PATCH] DaVinci: add support for CPPI 4.1

2009-03-24 Thread David Brownell
On Monday 23 March 2009, Kevin Hilman wrote: I was just trying to outline the large difference between 3.0 and 4.1 that warrants a new driver, so I'm not sure why TI people started to argue... I think the pushback was on your statement that they're so different as to be incompatible

RE: [PATCH] DaVinci: add support for CPPI 4.1

2009-03-23 Thread Subbrathnam, Swaminathan
22, 2009 4:43 PM To: Subbrathnam, Swaminathan Cc: David Brownell; davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com; linux- arm-ker...@lists.arm.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH] DaVinci: add support for CPPI 4.1 Hello. Subbrathnam, Swaminathan wrote: CPPI4.1 is an evolution over CPPI3.0

Re: [PATCH] DaVinci: add support for CPPI 4.1

2009-03-23 Thread David Brownell
On Monday 23 March 2009, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: I was just trying to outline the large difference between 3.0 and 4.1 that warrants a new driver, so I'm not sure why TI people started to argue... I think the pushback was on your statement that they're so different as to be incompatible through

Re: [PATCH] DaVinci: add support for CPPI 4.1

2009-03-23 Thread Kevin Hilman
David Brownell davi...@pacbell.net writes: On Monday 23 March 2009, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: I was just trying to outline the large difference between 3.0 and 4.1 that warrants a new driver, so I'm not sure why TI people started to argue... I think the pushback was on your statement that

RE: [PATCH] DaVinci: add support for CPPI 4.1

2009-03-23 Thread Subbrathnam, Swaminathan
...@lists.arm.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH] DaVinci: add support for CPPI 4.1 David Brownell davi...@pacbell.net writes: On Monday 23 March 2009, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: I was just trying to outline the large difference between 3.0 and 4.1 that warrants a new driver, so I'm not sure why TI people

Re: [PATCH] DaVinci: add support for CPPI 4.1

2009-03-22 Thread Sergei Shtylyov
To: David Brownell Cc: davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com; linux-arm-ker...@lists.arm.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH] DaVinci: add support for CPPI 4.1 David Brownell wrote: If this is only for the MUSB driver, it might be better to stash this code in driver/usb/musb and generalize

RE: [PATCH] DaVinci: add support for CPPI 4.1

2009-03-22 Thread Nori, Sekhar
From: Sergei Shtylyov Sent: Sunday, March 22, 2009 4:43 PM Hello. Subbrathnam, Swaminathan wrote: CPPI4.1 is an evolution over CPPI3.0. I would call the 3.0-to-4.1 changes rather revolutionary, than evolutionary... As I see it the following features evolved compared to 3.0 1.

Re: [PATCH] DaVinci: add support for CPPI 4.1

2009-03-20 Thread David Brownell
On Wednesday 18 March 2009, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: Add support for Texas Instuments Communication Port Programming Interface 4.1 (CPPI 4.1) used on OMAP-L137/DA830. At this moment, only the DMA controller and queue manager are supported. Support for the buffer manager is lacking but this

Re: [PATCH] DaVinci: add support for CPPI 4.1

2009-03-20 Thread Sergei Shtylyov
Hello. David Brownell wrote: Add support for Texas Instuments Communication Port Programming Interface 4.1 (CPPI 4.1) used on OMAP-L137/DA830. At this moment, only the DMA controller and queue manager are supported. Support for the buffer manager is lacking but this chip doesn't have it

RE: [PATCH] DaVinci: add support for CPPI 4.1

2009-03-20 Thread Subbrathnam, Swaminathan
To: davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.arm.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH] DaVinci: add support for CPPI 4.1 On Wednesday 18 March 2009, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: Add support for Texas Instuments Communication Port Programming Interface 4.1 (CPPI 4.1

Re: [PATCH] DaVinci: add support for CPPI 4.1

2009-03-20 Thread Sergei Shtylyov
David Brownell wrote: If this is only for the MUSB driver, it might be better to stash this code in driver/usb/musb and generalize the current CPPI glue there. Generalize what? There's no way CPPI 3.0 and 4.1 can be generalized, they're too unlike. If they're too unlike then they can't

Re: [PATCH] DaVinci: add support for CPPI 4.1

2009-03-20 Thread Sergei Shtylyov
David Brownell wrote: If this is only for the MUSB driver, it might be better to stash this code in driver/usb/musb and generalize the current CPPI glue there. Generalize what? There's no way CPPI 3.0 and 4.1 can be generalized, they're too unlike. If they're too unlike then they can't

Re: [PATCH] DaVinci: add support for CPPI 4.1

2009-03-18 Thread Sergei Shtylyov
Hello, I wrote: Add support for Texas Instuments Communication Port Programming Interface 4.1 (CPPI 4.1) used on OMAP-L137/DA830. At this moment, only the DMA controller and queue manager are supported. Support for the buffer manager is lacking but this chip doesn't have it anyway. --- As