[PATCH 0/6] i2c-davinci gpio pulsed SCL recovery with ICPFUNC

2011-04-05 Thread Ben Gardiner
This series for the i2c-davinci driver implements both a register dump and a pulsed-SCL recovery of the bus on those controllers that have ICPFUNC registers which is, so far, the da850 and da830 based platforms. I2C "controller timed out" messages were being observed by both myself on the da850evm

RE: [PATCH 0/6] i2c-davinci gpio pulsed SCL recovery with ICPFUNC

2011-04-13 Thread Nori, Sekhar
Hi Ben, On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 03:08:03, Ben Gardiner wrote: > This series for the i2c-davinci driver implements both a register dump and > a pulsed-SCL recovery of the bus on those controllers that have ICPFUNC > registers which is, so far, the da850 and da830 based platforms. > > I2C "controll

Re: [PATCH 0/6] i2c-davinci gpio pulsed SCL recovery with ICPFUNC

2011-04-18 Thread Ben Gardiner
Hi Sekhar, Thank you for reviewing the series. On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Nori, Sekhar wrote: > Hi Ben, > > On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 03:08:03, Ben Gardiner wrote: >> This series for the i2c-davinci driver implements both a register dump and >> a pulsed-SCL recovery of the bus on those cont

RE: [PATCH 0/6] i2c-davinci gpio pulsed SCL recovery with ICPFUNC

2011-04-18 Thread Jon Povey
Ben Gardiner wrote: >>> When creating this series I noticed that there are obvious >>> similarities between the existing recovery routine implemented by >>> Philby John and John Povey > I'm not sure how the 20us in the existing method was derived -- I > wonder if Philby John or John Povey could c

Re: [PATCH 0/6] i2c-davinci gpio pulsed SCL recovery with ICPFUNC

2011-04-19 Thread Ben Gardiner
Hi Jon, On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Jon Povey wrote: > Ben Gardiner wrote: > When creating this series I noticed that there are obvious similarities between the existing recovery routine implemented by Philby John and John Povey > >> I'm not sure how the 20us in the existing m

RE: [PATCH 0/6] i2c-davinci gpio pulsed SCL recovery with ICPFUNC

2011-04-19 Thread Jon Povey
Ben Gardiner wrote: > In "i2c-davinci: Fix race when setting up for TX" and "i2c-davinci: > Fix TX setup for more SoCs" you mention testing on DM355 -- is there > any you have hardware on which the recovery procedure is executed on > occasion and that you would be available to test modifications to