[PATCH 3/3] davinci: Map sram using MT_MEMORY_NONCACHED instead of MT_DEVICE

2010-08-13 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Davinci SRAM is mapped as MT_DEVICE becasue of the section mapping pre-requisite instead of intended MT_MEMORY_NONCACHED Since the section mapping limitation gets fixed with first patch in this series, the MT_MEMORY_NONCACHED can be used now. Have not tested this, so somebody with Davinci hard

Re: [PATCH 3/3] davinci: Map sram using MT_MEMORY_NONCACHED instead of MT_DEVICE

2010-08-19 Thread Kevin Hilman
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 3:18 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: > On Davinci SRAM is mapped as MT_DEVICE becasue of the section > mapping pre-requisite instead of intended MT_MEMORY_NONCACHED > > Since the section mapping limitation gets fixed with first > patch in this series, the MT_MEMORY_NONCACHED ca

Re: [PATCH 3/3] davinci: Map sram using MT_MEMORY_NONCACHED instead of MT_DEVICE

2010-08-26 Thread Kevin Hilman
Kevin Hilman writes: > On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 3:18 AM, Santosh Shilimkar > wrote: >> On Davinci SRAM is mapped as MT_DEVICE becasue of the section >> mapping pre-requisite instead of intended MT_MEMORY_NONCACHED >> >> Since the section mapping limitation gets fixed with first >> patch in this se

RE: [PATCH 3/3] davinci: Map sram using MT_MEMORY_NONCACHED instead of MT_DEVICE

2010-08-26 Thread Shilimkar, Santosh
bject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] davinci: Map sram using MT_MEMORY_NONCACHED > instead of MT_DEVICE > > Kevin Hilman writes: > > > On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 3:18 AM, Santosh Shilimkar > > wrote: > >> On Davinci SRAM is mapped as MT_DEVICE becasue of the section > >>

RE: [PATCH 3/3] davinci: Map sram using MT_MEMORY_NONCACHED instead of MT_DEVICE

2010-09-04 Thread Shilimkar, Santosh
ead.org; > davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com > Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/3] davinci: Map sram using MT_MEMORY_NONCACHED > instead of MT_DEVICE > > > -Original Message- > > From: Kevin Hilman [mailto:khil...@deeprootsystems.com] > > Sent: Friday, August 27