Signed-off-by: Hugo Villeneuve
---
sound/soc/davinci/davinci-sffsdr.c |3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/davinci/davinci-sffsdr.c
b/sound/soc/davinci/davinci-sffsdr.c
index 7fdfba8..1fc53c1 100644
--- a/sound/soc/davinci/davinci-sffsdr.c
+++ b/so
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:29:23 +
Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 11:32:09PM -0400, Hugo Villeneuve wrote:
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > + davinci_cfg_reg(DM644X_MCBSP);
> > +
>
> I can't find any references to this function in mainline?
Hi Mark,
I based those patches
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:16:32 +
Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:03:41AM -0400, Hugo Villeneuve wrote:
>
> > I based those patches on the latest linux-davinci git tree, which
> > has the function.
>
> Do not submit patches for mainline which are not based on mainline
> trees.
Hugo Villeneuve writes:
> On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:16:32 +
> Mark Brown wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:03:41AM -0400, Hugo Villeneuve wrote:
>>
>> > I based those patches on the latest linux-davinci git tree, which
>> > has the function.
>>
>> Do not submit patches for mainline which
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 08:55:06 -0700
Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Hugo Villeneuve writes:
>
> > On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:16:32 +
> > Mark Brown wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:03:41AM -0400, Hugo Villeneuve wrote:
> >>
> >> > I based those patches on the latest linux-davinci git tree, whi
Mark Brown writes:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 08:55:06AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>
>> On a related note, sound/soc/davinci/davinci-[evm,sffsdr].c is
>> actually board-level setup code and should not actually live in
>> sound/asoc/. It should live in arch/arm/mach-davinci/* and follow the
>> re
Hugo Villeneuve writes:
> On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 08:55:06 -0700
> Kevin Hilman wrote:
>
>> Hugo Villeneuve writes:
>>
>> > On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:16:32 +
>> > Mark Brown wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:03:41AM -0400, Hugo Villeneuve wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > I based those patches on
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:20:15 -0700
Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Hugo Villeneuve writes:
>
> > On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 08:55:06 -0700
> > Kevin Hilman wrote:
> >
> >> Hugo Villeneuve writes:
> >>
> >> > On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:16:32 +
> >> > Mark Brown wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 1
Hugo Villeneuve writes:
> On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:20:15 -0700
> Kevin Hilman wrote:
>
>> Hugo Villeneuve writes:
>>
>> > On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 08:55:06 -0700
>> > Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hugo Villeneuve writes:
>> >>
>> >> > On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:16:32 +
>> >> > Mark Brown wrote:
On Tuesday 10 March 2009, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> >
> > Ok, so the patch affecting sound/soc/davinci/davinci-evm.c SHOULD have
> > been submitted to ALSA first.
>
> Yes, but it should've been a patch against an ASoC tree, not against
> DaVinci git which may contain things not (yet) in the ASoC tree.
> >> The DaVinci ASoC code is indeed in mainline, but not all of the
> >> DaVinci core (in this case the pin mux) is yet in mainline. I will be
> >> pushing it during the next merge window.
> >
> > That doesn't really answer my question.
> >
> > I can see that David Brownell pushed a patch to the
11 matches
Mail list logo
