"Paulraj, Sandeep" writes:
> Kevin,
>
> Please see inline
>
>>
>> > The patch has received no comments so far (here and on spi-general-
>> devel).
>> >
>> > Can someone test it on davinci's other that the DM6446 to see that
>> support for
>> > others has not broken?
>> >
>> > Kevin - Is there an
Kevin,
Please see inline
>
> > The patch has received no comments so far (here and on spi-general-
> devel).
> >
> > Can someone test it on davinci's other that the DM6446 to see that
> support for
> > others has not broken?
> >
> > Kevin - Is there anything that keeps it from merging upstream t
Pablo Bitton writes:
> The patch has received no comments so far (here and on spi-general-devel).
>
> Can someone test it on davinci's other that the DM6446 to see that support for
> others has not broken?
>
> Kevin - Is there anything that keeps it from merging upstream to this tree?
Hi Pablo,
This patch adds support for SPI in DaVinci DM6446
(and tries to keep support for DM355/DM365/DM6467 and DA8xx).
Mostly the same as the patch by Sandeep Paulraj.
This has been tested on the DM6446 by defining a spidev device and using a
scope (to check correctness) and a hardware loopback.
This
