Hi Laurent,
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 13:19:40, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Manjunath,
>
> On Friday 11 May 2012 05:32:13 Hadli, Manjunath wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 15:36:16, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 17 April 2012 14:22:59 Manjunath Hadli wrote:
> > > > As the same interru
Hi Manjunath,
On Friday 11 May 2012 05:32:13 Hadli, Manjunath wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 15:36:16, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Tuesday 17 April 2012 14:22:59 Manjunath Hadli wrote:
> > > As the same interrupt is shared between capture and display devices,
> > > sometimes we get isr calls
Hi Laurent,
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 15:36:16, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Manjunath,
>
> Thanks for the patch.
>
> On Tuesday 17 April 2012 14:22:59 Manjunath Hadli wrote:
> > As the same interrupt is shared between capture and display devices,
> > sometimes we get isr calls where the interrup
Hi Manjunath,
Thanks for the patch.
On Tuesday 17 April 2012 14:22:59 Manjunath Hadli wrote:
> As the same interrupt is shared between capture and display devices,
> sometimes we get isr calls where the interrupt might not genuinely belong
> to capture or display. Hence, add a condition in the is
As the same interrupt is shared between capture and display devices,
sometimes we get isr calls where the interrupt might not genuinely belong
to capture or display. Hence, add a condition in the isr to check for
interrupt ownership and channel number to make sure we do not
service wrong interrupts
