On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 10:05:45PM -0400, Ben Gardiner wrote:
> From your other email I see now that the intended behaviour can be
> accomplished entirely in the application. Returning _POS_XRUN should
> be sufficient here in ASoC.
OK, great - I was worried this might get complicated but if the d
On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Mark Brown
wrote:
> This looks like something we should be doing at the subsystem level, the
> DaVinci is far from unique in having the ability to detect errors at the
> DAI level.
Agreed; I started out with the intent to call DAI health ops from
snd_pcm_update_hw_
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 05:23:02PM -0400, Ben Gardiner wrote:
> The CPU DAIs available to the davinci-pcm driver have the capability of
> detecting and reporting errors.
> Add callbacks to the struct davinci_pcm_dma_params passed to davinci-pcm
> from the CPU DAI.
This looks like something we sho
The CPU DAIs available to the davinci-pcm driver have the capability of
detecting and reporting errors.
Add callbacks to the struct davinci_pcm_dma_params passed to davinci-pcm
from the CPU DAI.
This has several shortcomings:
1) It bubbles up to the user as underruns, not a fatal error -- some ma
