Re: DVFlasher/TI UBL replacement, how to go on?

2007-09-11 Thread Ivan Tonchev
Hi Lloyd, Personally, I am more interested in SOURCE portability than executable portability. My development tools are written in C or CPP - these are the gold standard of Linux. I have seen little that .NET offers that provides anything at this low a level. Frankly, downloaders are trivial

DVFlasher/TI UBL replacement, how to go on?

2007-09-04 Thread Dirk Behme
Now, we have three different candiates for DVFlasher/TI UBL replacement: 1. rboot load.c based http://linux.omap.com/pipermail/davinci-linux-open-source/2007-August/003916.html 2. BOOTME BOOTMMS mmsuartloader mmsnandloader

Re: DVFlasher/TI UBL replacement, how to go on?

2007-09-04 Thread Philip Balister
I took a quick look at the three options and also conclude the best starting point is Sergey's tool. It is already in C and the code is GPL, so it should make the best starting point for future work. Philip Dirk Behme wrote: Now, we have three different candiates for DVFlasher/TI UBL