Hello Bastian,
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 7:52 AM, wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we have problems with the davinci-i2c driver on an omapl-138 (Logic PD
> SOM) in
> conjunction with tps65070 hardware and tps6507x_ts touchscreen driver.
>
> (The following thread is related to this issue.
> http://www.mail-arch
Spoke too soon.
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Ben Gardiner
wrote:
> [...]
> When I revert:
> c5b4afec8e669bbe265daea24037fccfc42c4fe3 i2c-davinci: Fix TX setup for more
> SoCs
> 4bba0fd8d1c6d405df666e2573e1a1f917098be0 i2c-davinci: Fix race when
> setting up for TX
It just took longer than u
Hi Bastian,
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 5:08 AM, wrote:
> Hello,
>
> [...]
>> >
>> > After some action on the touchscreen, there are communication errors
>> > on the i2c, and the bus stalled.
>> > In this state the SDA line is hold low and the driver gives repeatedly
>> > the following messages:
>>
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 18:55:00, Ben Gardiner wrote:
> I noticed on the e2e forums that there is a reason why the PSP uses a
> bitbanging i2c interface -- since the 1.0v OPP makes the i2c
> controller unusable [1] (I've added Sekhar to the CC since he pointed
> out the problem in that post).
The
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 10:13 AM, wrote:
> [...]
>> I wonder if there is YA hardware problem with i2c on the LogicPD
>> boards. I've noticed that when I don't have the UBI board connected
>> then I don't get the controller timeouts.
>>
>
> I have some effects here, too.
> We have a i2c repeater s
Hi Sekhar,
Thanks for rapidly weighing-in here.
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 18:55:00, Ben Gardiner wrote:
>
>> I noticed on the e2e forums that there is a reason why the PSP uses a
>> bitbanging i2c interface -- since the 1.0v OPP makes the i2c
Hi Bastian,
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 12:13:31, bastian.rupp...@sewerin.de wrote:
> Dear Sekhar,
>
> >
> > RE: How to put extra clock cycles on i2c cavinci, problems on
> > omapl138 (logic pd som)
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 18:55:00, Ben Gardiner wr
