Re: [PATCH] DM644x EVM: register MUSB device earlier

2011-03-14 Thread Felipe Balbi
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 11:06:59PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > The MUSB driver doesn't see its platform device on DM644x EVM board anymore > since commit 73b089b052a69020b953312a624a6e1eb5b81fab (usb: musb: split > davinci > to its own platform_driver) because the new probe is called as > sub

Re: [PATCH] DM644x EVM: register MUSB device earlier

2011-03-14 Thread Kevin Hilman
Felipe Balbi writes: [...] > > Kevin feel free to take this into your tree: > > Acked-by: Felipe Balbi > OK, will queue for 2.6.39. Thanks, Kevin ___ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list Davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com http://linux

RE: [PATCH] DM644x EVM: register MUSB device earlier

2011-03-14 Thread Nori, Sekhar
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 22:12:54, Hilman, Kevin wrote: > Felipe Balbi writes: > > [...] > > > > > Kevin feel free to take this into your tree: > > > > Acked-by: Felipe Balbi > > > > OK, will queue for 2.6.39. This will need to make into 2.6.38. Hi Russell, Without this fix, USB will remain

Re: [PATCH] DM644x EVM: register MUSB device earlier

2011-03-14 Thread Sergei Shtylyov
Hello. Felipe Balbi wrote: The MUSB driver doesn't see its platform device on DM644x EVM board anymore since commit 73b089b052a69020b953312a624a6e1eb5b81fab (usb: musb: split davinci to its own platform_driver) because the new probe is called as subsys_initcall() now, and the device is register

Re: [PATCH] DM644x EVM: register MUSB device earlier

2011-03-15 Thread Felipe Balbi
Hi, On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 09:52:58PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > >I wonder how noone has noticed that from -rc1 until now. > >I don't think many people run the most current DaVinci kernel. > Most people probably use the Arago project kernels or even older > MV-based TI's stuff... that'

Re: [PATCH] DM644x EVM: register MUSB device earlier

2011-03-15 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 11:14:37PM +0530, Nori, Sekhar wrote: > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 22:12:54, Hilman, Kevin wrote: > > Felipe Balbi writes: > > > > [...] > > > > > > > > Kevin feel free to take this into your tree: > > > > > > Acked-by: Felipe Balbi > > > > > > > OK, will queue for 2.6.39.

RE: [PATCH] DM644x EVM: register MUSB device earlier

2011-03-15 Thread Nori, Sekhar
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 15:38:56, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 11:14:37PM +0530, Nori, Sekhar wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 22:12:54, Hilman, Kevin wrote: > > > Felipe Balbi writes: > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > > > > > > Kevin feel free to take this into your t

Re: [PATCH] DM644x EVM: register MUSB device earlier

2011-03-15 Thread Sergei Shtylyov
Hello. Nori, Sekhar wrote: Felipe Balbi writes: [...] Kevin feel free to take this into your tree: Acked-by: Felipe Balbi OK, will queue for 2.6.39. This will need to make into 2.6.38. Hi Russell, Without this fix, USB will remain broken on 2.6.38 on DM644x EVM. Any chance

Re: [PATCH] DM644x EVM: register MUSB device earlier

2011-03-16 Thread Sergei Shtylyov
Hello. On 15-03-2011 12:33, Felipe Balbi wrote: I wonder how noone has noticed that from -rc1 until now. I don't think many people run the most current DaVinci kernel. Most people probably use the Arago project kernels or even older MV-based TI's stuff... that's nasty :-p All those ha

Re: [PATCH] DM644x EVM: register MUSB device earlier

2011-03-16 Thread Felipe Balbi
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 02:42:32PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Hello. > > On 15-03-2011 12:33, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > >>>I wonder how noone has noticed that from -rc1 until now. > > >>I don't think many people run the most current DaVinci kernel. > >>Most people probably use the Arago p

Re: [PATCH] DM644x EVM: register MUSB device earlier

2011-03-16 Thread Felipe Balbi
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 02:47:33PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 02:42:32PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > > Hello. > > > > On 15-03-2011 12:33, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > > > >>>I wonder how noone has noticed that from -rc1 until now. > > > > >>I don't think many people