RE: [PATCH 0/6] i2c-davinci gpio pulsed SCL recovery with ICPFUNC

2011-04-13 Thread Nori, Sekhar
Hi Ben, On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 03:08:03, Ben Gardiner wrote: > This series for the i2c-davinci driver implements both a register dump and > a pulsed-SCL recovery of the bus on those controllers that have ICPFUNC > registers which is, so far, the da850 and da830 based platforms. > > I2C "controll

Re: [PATCH 0/6] i2c-davinci gpio pulsed SCL recovery with ICPFUNC

2011-04-18 Thread Ben Gardiner
Hi Sekhar, Thank you for reviewing the series. On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Nori, Sekhar wrote: > Hi Ben, > > On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 03:08:03, Ben Gardiner wrote: >> This series for the i2c-davinci driver implements both a register dump and >> a pulsed-SCL recovery of the bus on those cont

RE: [PATCH 0/6] i2c-davinci gpio pulsed SCL recovery with ICPFUNC

2011-04-18 Thread Jon Povey
Ben Gardiner wrote: >>> When creating this series I noticed that there are obvious >>> similarities between the existing recovery routine implemented by >>> Philby John and John Povey > I'm not sure how the 20us in the existing method was derived -- I > wonder if Philby John or John Povey could c

Re: [PATCH 0/6] i2c-davinci gpio pulsed SCL recovery with ICPFUNC

2011-04-19 Thread Ben Gardiner
Hi Jon, On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Jon Povey wrote: > Ben Gardiner wrote: > When creating this series I noticed that there are obvious similarities between the existing recovery routine implemented by Philby John and John Povey > >> I'm not sure how the 20us in the existing m

RE: [PATCH 0/6] i2c-davinci gpio pulsed SCL recovery with ICPFUNC

2011-04-19 Thread Jon Povey
Ben Gardiner wrote: > In "i2c-davinci: Fix race when setting up for TX" and "i2c-davinci: > Fix TX setup for more SoCs" you mention testing on DM355 -- is there > any you have hardware on which the recovery procedure is executed on > occasion and that you would be available to test modifications to