om:* Ivan Tonchev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:* Thursday, March 15, 2007 11:53 AM
*To:* Allred, Daniel
*Cc:* Monk, Roger; Linux DaVinci
*Subject:* Re: UBL for 128MB DDR
Great to hear that you'd be dropping the s-rec format. It's bloats
images quite a bit and makes downloads over the UA
now.
Regards,
Daniel
Daniel J. Allred
Software Applications
Catalog DSP / Emerging End Equipment
*From:* Ivan Tonchev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:* Thursday, March 15, 2007 11:53 AM
*To:* Allred, Daniel
*Cc:* Monk, Roger; Linux DaVinci
*Subject:* Re: UBL for 128MB DDR
Linux DaVinci
Subject: Re: UBL for 128MB DDR
OK, great. And just a little suggestion -- if you are in charge of
choosing the binary image header format (to be stored in NAND, NOR, HDD
or whatever medium), why don't you use uImage?
Several months ago I wrote a nand UBL replacement with uIma
---
*From:* Ivan Tonchev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:* Thursday, March 15, 2007 11:53 AM
*To:* Allred, Daniel
*Cc:* Monk, Roger; Linux DaVinci
*Subject:* Re: UBL for 128MB DDR
Great to hear that you'd be dropping the s-rec format. It's bloats
images quite a bit and makes download
rging End Equipment
From: Ivan Tonchev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 11:53 AM
To: Allred, Daniel
Cc: Monk, Roger; Linux DaVinci
Subject: Re: UBL for 128MB DDR
Great to hear that you'd be dropping the s-rec format. It's bloats
Great to hear that you'd be dropping the s-rec format. It's bloats
images quite a bit and makes downloads over the UART more slower than
they should be.
What would be the format you'd use? Have you decided yet?
Can you tell us more about the new application you are developing?
Thanks,
Ivan
A
Ivan,
Thanks for the suggestions. It's certainly true that the two programs
(the UBL and the host app) can be made more user friendly for porting to
custom boards, as that wasn't the primary goal when I began writing
them. I'm now working on a similar program for the next DaVinci device,
and
