d flash my uImage here and it works fine
>
> Regard's
> RT
>
> --- On *Sun, 31/1/10, Herbert Miao * wrote:
>
>
> From: Herbert Miao
> Subject: Re: problem with u-boot on NAND memory with dm6446
> To: "Ottavio Campana"
> Cc: davinci-linux-open-source@li
> > In any case I would assume that after 0x6 (i.e. 384k) no data would
> > be present, and by erasing it nothing would happen. But By erasing it
> > u-boot stops working.
> >
> > The commands I give are:
> >
> > nand erase 0x0006 0x0040
> > nand write 0x8070 0x0006 0x004000
but the uboot is layout on 0x0-0xa.
On 31 January 2010 22:39, Herbert Miao wrote:
> > > In any case I would assume that after 0x6 (i.e. 384k) no data
> would
> > > be present, and by erasing it nothing would happen. But By erasing
> it
> > > u-boot stops working.
> > >
> > > The comm
On Friday 29 January 2010 10:41:19 am Ottavio Campana wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 09:42:43AM +0200, Caglar Akyuz wrote:
> > On Monday 25 January 2010 06:49:23 pm Ottavio Campana wrote:
> > > I'm trying to put u-boot on a custom board based on dm6446 in a
> > > NAND memory.
> > >
> > > I fi
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 09:42:43AM +0200, Caglar Akyuz wrote:
> On Monday 25 January 2010 06:49:23 pm Ottavio Campana wrote:
> > I'm trying to put u-boot on a custom board based on dm6446 in a NAND
> > memory.
> >
> > I find some mismatches between the montavista linux kernel and u-boot
> >
On Monday 25 January 2010 06:49:23 pm Ottavio Campana wrote:
> I'm trying to put u-boot on a custom board based on dm6446 in a NAND
> memory.
>
> I find some mismatches between the montavista linux kernel and u-boot
> 2009.11 .
>
Are they using the same ecc/oob layout? In the past(2.6.10
I'm trying to put u-boot on a custom board based on dm6446 in a NAND
memory.
I find some mismatches between the montavista linux kernel and u-boot
2009.11 .
Particularly, in linux-2.6.18_pro500/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-evm.c
the variable davinci_nand_partitions has 4 elements bootload
